• neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Then I’ll do it for you: Yes, that thing looks scary, but it’s only the slat. The plane can fly without it, but the landing will have to be done at slightly higher than normal speed. The wing itself is made from much stronger material.

    I’m curious about the cause, though. Could have been initiated by a bird strike.

    • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      The issue I have with this isn’t the slat itself, but that the plane took off with this entirely unmanaged. Tape is fine, even missing bolts are fine, this is not something that you’re just allowed to ignore. Deferred maintenance is never a good idea.

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I didn’t see anything in the linked article about it looking like that before takeoff, though? I’m having a hard time believing that the pilot would just think “meh, it’s fine” if it was discovered during the preflight walk-around.

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          There is no way they took off with it looking like this. If you did it could cost you your license depending on the mood the local FAA office is in.