Jakdracula@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · vor 1 Jahrx last nightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up12Karrow-down166file-text
arrow-up11.93Karrow-down1imagex last nightlemmy.worldJakdracula@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · vor 1 Jahrmessage-square108fedilinkfile-text
I posted this earlier today in the tech lemmy instance, but, they have no sense of humor and deleted it. I’m trying here.
minus-squareMaxPow3r11@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down2·vor 1 JahrThey spelled EAT wrong.
minus-squarefidodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·vor 1 JahrThe joke is that Twitter put a giant X Sign on the roof of their building so the edit needs to include an X
minus-squareDavidRay@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·vor 1 JahrNope, T A X is an acceptable alternative spelling for E A T.
minus-squareRobaque@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·vor 1 JahrNah, for them, taxes would just be another small hurdle to squash
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·vor 1 JahrMake it a tiered hurdle: top tier, above $1M, 98% income taxes.
minus-squareResol van Lemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·vor 1 JahrTaxing the rich, and then eating them. What could possibly go wrong?
They spelled EAT wrong.
The joke is that Twitter put a giant X Sign on the roof of their building so the edit needs to include an X
Nope, T A X is an acceptable alternative spelling for E A T.
Nah, for them, taxes would just be another small hurdle to squash
Make it a tiered hurdle: top tier, above $1M, 98% income taxes.
¿Por que no los dos?
Taxing the rich, and then eating them. What could possibly go wrong?