• Kwdg
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean if oyu don’t like it, then don’t use it or install an extension. I never missed a bar at the bottom and can find all open windows in the overview very quickly

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but extensions work to a degree and not out of the box. For instance, when they abandoned desktop icons a long time ago we never had and extension that delivered the same polished experience.

      • thegreenguy@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        GNOME has some quite strict design guidelines (a “vision”, if you will). And sticking to that a vision has enabled them to create a very polished DE (probably the most polished DE on Linux). What people get wrong is that GNOME wasn’t really made for desktops. It was made for mobile devices (laptops, tablets, and in the future phones). Using GNOME on a “proper” mobile device really makes sense. No, that doesn’t mean using a laptop connected to an external monitor all the time, or just using it at a desk all the time. It means using a laptop as a laptops, going out and about, using it without a mouse and using it with it’s internal display.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          GNOME wasn’t really made for desktops

          I can certainly believe that. Yet, pretty much every desktop distro ships it as the default, which boggles my mind.

          • thegreenguy@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well GNOME is the most polished, which means it eneded up being the most popular, which means GTK has the most apps, which makes GNOME look very polished, and the cycle repeats itself.

            Also the vast majority of people use laptops, not desktops.

            • pitninja@lemmy.pit.ninja
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why not? Plasma is much more usable out of the box for many users including myself. GNOME’s out of the box experience is really lacking IMHO and requires me to install and configure several extensions just to get what I consider to be a functional UI. I know they have this vision for how they want people to use their OS, but that vision is not aligned with how I actually want to use it. The best way distros can vote against the design choices of GNOME is by making something else the default. The problem I have is that I generally prefer GNOME’s app suite to KDE’s, so that makes the decision a bit more complicated for me.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              XFCE. Just as mature, also GTK-based, and a truly happy medium between predefined choices and customization without excessive complexity.

        • alteropen@noc.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @thegreenguy @TCB13 yep this exactly I first used gnome on a laptop and the experience is great the gesture support makes all the workspaces and different overviews work perfectly

          then I started using it on desktop and it just doesn’t work the same. it feels clunky and far from as smooth.