A man stabbed six people to death at a busy Sydney shopping center Saturday before he was fatally shot, police said, with hundreds fleeing the chaotic scene, many weeping as they carried their children. Eight people, including a 9-month-old, were injured.

New South Wales police said they believed a 40-year-old man was responsible for the Saturday afternoon attack at the Westfield Shopping Centre in Bondi Junction, in the city’s eastern suburbs and not far from the world-famous Bondi Beach. They said they were not able to name him until a formal identification had taken place but that they weren’t treating the attack as terrorism-related.

The man was shot dead by a police inspector after he turned and raised a knife, New South Wales Assistant Police Commissioner Anthony Cooke told reporters.

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    74
    ·
    8 months ago

    No it’s not, the majority of Americans are ok owning firearms. The view that we shouldn’t be able to own firearms is a minority one and is more so prevalent on the Internet in echo chambers that lean left.

    Also, we made a comment because automatic weapons are basically non-existent here in the USA, which is something the anti-gun crowd continually is ignorant on.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is a clear majority of Americans that don’t believe automatic weapons should be legal - generally America is pro hunting rifle (with the common impression those are akin to old bolt action or breech loading rifles in fire rate). The semi and fully automatic weapons poll unfavorably - especially handguns.

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That says three quarters of gun owners claim self defense as the reason, it doesn’t say three quarter of Americans own guns for self defense.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Where did I say that 3/4s own guns? You stated the majority own firearms for hunting, which is completely false.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              To clarify, I’m not them - but I said the majority of Americans support hunting rifle ownership. When you get into auto or semi-auto that shifts to a minority. And yea, America outlaws fully automatic weapons but rapid fire semi automatic firearms are quite legal.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                8 months ago

                Do you know that the majority of hunting rifles are semi automatic? Like 80% of all the firearms Americans own are semi automatic. The majority of Americans are ok with firearm ownership. Those who are against firearms for civilian ownership is a minority.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    The people in this thread don’t understand how statics or well anything works. They’re just pissy that their world views don’t line up with what this circle jerk of antigun people feed each other. They’re at the personal attacks already.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s a classist ban, the poor cannot afford them but the wealthy can. Cheapest stuff you can get is around 20k+ they are effectively banned.

    • azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      The anti-gun crowd is also ignorant of the practicalities of automatic vs semiautomatic. What they mean is “civilians shouldn’t have mostly unrestricted access to firearms, especially ones with no use for hunting” and getting hung up on technical minutia misses the point entirely.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        No pretty sure most of them mean “ban guns”. I’ve seen too many “no one wants to take your guns” posts that followed with a “but…”

      • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        mostly unrestricted access

        This only works to prevent mass shootings of opportunity, the planners just jump the necessary hoops

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Unrestricted” is quite a leap, I have to pass background checks, and depending on state, there is a waiting period before I can take the firearm home. Concealed carry also requires classes with certificates and gun range proof with instructors, and FBI fingerprint check and storage in their database forever.

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That depends on your state…also depends on how close you live to an unregulated state.