• RedDoozer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Actually, there seems to be a bit of a mix-up. Let me clarify.

    In an anarchist group, enforcing anything goes against its fundamental principles.

    If personal gain is the motive, one isn’t truly aligned with the group’s social contract and isn’t considered part of it.

    Decisions are made collectively, without hierarchy. Voting or delegating organisational tasks to sub-groups is the norm.

    I won’t go into words like “attacking,” “defense,” or “threats” as they are military terms, far from the anarchist ethos.

    And I won’t call you “bro” or make you read theory. I feel you won’t.

      • RedDoozer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why defenseless? The entire organization can defense itself from outsiders. No need of hierarchy for that.

        • Chuymatt@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Just one gifted sociopath dooms it from the inside…

          I long for mutual aid society, but every time I have participated in any form of it, I’ve had to back away as it invariably becomes toxic. I just don’t have the energy to keep fighting, honestly.