• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What the fuck are these people so scared of that they start blasting folk for pulling into their driveway? This seems to keep happening and nobody ever thinks to check up on the mf who almost blasted a delivery driver who got the wrong address? Forget just charging the dude with attempted murder, can we search the house and take away firearms from somebody so clearly irresponsible that they can’t distinguish a genuine threat from an imagined one?

    If the second amendment won’t allow that to happen, then the amendment needs to be re-written.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 months ago

      A diet of fear mongering media with a heaping helping of social isolation.

      Antisocial monsters are made surprisingly easily.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The second amendment absolutely would allow that to happen. To people purposefully misrepresenting what it says won’t.

      First, it says what it says because we need a militia to protect the nation, which was once true when an professional standing army wasn’t expected but no longer is.

      Second, the goal is for a well regulated militia. Even if we assume it still applies (it doesn’t, but let’s pretend), nothing about this is well regulated. Make sure people have training if you’re going to let people own firearms so freely.

      • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It wasn’t that a professional standing army “wasn’t expected” - in fact they were quite common at the time. Standing armies don’t tend to go unused, they make it easy for asshole politicians to pick stupid fights with other countries. Not having one was a deliberate choice we made to avoid such things, and for the most part it worked, for a little while at least.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I wouldn’t say the were quite common. They weren’t unheard of, but only the major powers in the world could afford them. The US would be a nation of mostly farmers isolated from most of the developed world. There’s no reason they would have expected to become a world power. A militia, at the time, would seem to be the reasonable expectation for such a nation for the foreseeable future.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a responsible gun owner: they can and should take his guns away. There’s multiple felonies he can be charged with and he’ll almost certainly be convicted of at least one.