• SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s such a predictable cycle. Labour get in, spend a shit load of money sorting everything out, then in 5 years time the Conservatives will say “look how much money they’ve wasted”, and everyone will forget about what the Cons have done with money in the last few years…and that’s a best case scenario.

    • 1rre
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Also don’t forget both the Tories and Labour variously doing major projects only for the next government to take the credit, while simultaneously criticising the previous govenment for both not investing and spending more than them, as the next government only finished the project and aren’t starting anything new.

      “Luckily” the Tories know they have no chance of winning, so they’re cancelling all the major projects and salting the earth so that Labour don’t get to take the credit in a few years.

      (representative democracy is a scam give me an absolute monarch or direct democracy only please & thank you)

      (or frankly the realistic option of elected people who set the agenda and weekly referendums where people vote on the things they care about and abstain/don’t show up for other things)

        • 1rre
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think that because referendums are so rare and it was such a major issue that people came out in droves to vote even if they didn’t have a strong opinion, and that’d probably still happen for “big things” but one would hope for normal things that you’d only get serial voters, who are likely to be informed given they’re voting all the time, and people who are interested in the subject matter