Australia’s Mona asked a court to reverse its ruling that allowed men inside a women’s only space.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/oHT6U

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, Nicholas is at the very top of my official knighted family tree. Again, it’s a family name. Should never have been used in any sort of derogatory adjective form, whether back in 1840 or in 1960, or anywhere in between or since.

    Believe me, I know my roots, and I know that I don’t agree with the sexism use of my last name. You’re quoting a definition that came up in a very prejudiced era from the 1960s, back when certain people weren’t allowed to do certain things, such as drink from the wrong water fountain.

    You sure do seem to know a lot about these antiquated discriminatory words don’t you? Have you considered trying to like not refer to dictionaries written in discriminatory times?

    Back on point, yes I’ve gathered that Picasso wasn’t all that great of a dude. Neither was Mozart, he had a shit fetish. Does that stop people from appreciating their artistic works?

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think you have a backward view of what sexism in the 60s looked like, and at this point can’t tell if you’re trolling, since Nicholas Chauvin was a fictional character.

      And my god man, I have no beef with Picasso and never said no one should appreciate Picasso’s works. I was arguing with you:

      I’m pretty sure that if you asked Picasso, if he were alive of course, that he would heavily protest the discrimination and encourage anyone mature enough to view his works.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nicholas was most certainly not a fictional character. Try getting an actual official Chauvin family tree ancestry and read over it. You’ll see.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          “Most certainly” according to what source? Every source I see says there’s zero historical evidence he ever existed, and many stories attributed to him have been traced to other actual historical figures.

          Responding to your other comment here, I think you’re just completely missing the point. Again, I’m not saying no one should appreciate Picasso’s art. I’m saying that way back in the before-times, when we were talking about an art installation that challenges gender discrimination, you said Picasso would “heavily protest the discrimination,” but based on all available evidence, that’s what the French call “horseshit.”

          And Karen is already in the dictionary. I know some Karens who are lovely people and who could care less about its common usage.

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Every source you see has also been tainted by Derek’s horrible actions and the nature of the internet to corrupt information.

            Like I said, get an official Chauvin family ancestry book (you know, those things made with paper), and read over the family tree, before the era of digital corruption.

            My late grandmother had the official ancestry book.

            There are other sources of information besides our now half bot/AI corrupted internet.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              And of course, the Battle of Schrute Farms was the northernmost battle of the Civil War.

              • over_clox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                What does that (or even some of my own comments) have anything to do with the price of weed in Colorado? Whether you’re telling me the truth, or just trying to bullshit me, doesn’t matter.

                My point is very simple, and nobody seems to be getting it now. Drop the prejudice words already. We don’t live in the 1800s, and honestly none of us ever did.

                We’re descendants of our ancestors. We didn’t get to pick where we were born or in what year, or by what family name, but we can try dropping the discrimination of centuries past.

                Continuing to use derogatory words and even references from back then only propagate the discrimination.

                When any group uses offensive words and tactics against any ‘opposite’ group, they’re just propagating the problem.

                My whole point is people should stop doing that, and realize they’re only propagating the problem.

                All people are created equal. Men, women, light or dark. All born equal and should generally be treated as such. Yes some grow up to be bad apples, but damn, when they’re long dead, don’t blame their descendants.

                Break the cycle.

                Edit: My starting point was basically that any and all mature adults should have every right to visit any museum they want. It’s artwork and artifacts, not a brothel.