• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Debian maintainer is probably a volunteer. Can we not troll people who make Debian and Foss possible?

    • chameleon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The KeePassXC people are also volunteers and dealing with the fallout of this decision.

        • vrighter
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          well it is that one person causing issues

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If by issues you mean looking out for people’s privacy sure, someone has to.

            • vrighter
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              by issues I mean breaking existing users’ workflow, possibly literally locking them out (I personally use a yubikey with my keepass db, for example).

              There is a very simple solution he could have done: not rename the existing package. Just give his fork a new name. That’s it, everybody is happy.

              So yes, he is the one causing issues. Because the issue isn’t in the features he removed, but by breaking the users’expectation that the package they installed yesterday, is the same one they’re updating today.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      To be fair, it looks like the debian maintainer started the unfriendly discourse by calling the work of other FOSS devs “crap”

      Everyone needs to chill out, otherwise we have another potential XZ social engineering attack

      It would be catastrophic for something like keepass to have a malicious maintainer take over

    • federalreverse-old@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You have a point to some degree, yet I still think it is defensible to make this post. He majorly altered software

      • downstream
      • against user expectations
      • for somewhat spurious reasons
      • seemingly quite ad-hoc

      He then went on to defend that decision in a less-than-graceful way before announcing there will be a second, new package.

      But, to make it clear: I certainly don’t approve of hate directed toward him and I don’t have a personal issue with him.