It’s probably a measure of functional literacy, like the ability to read through a page of information and understand it fluently. Someone who is able to sound words out one by one wouldn’t be considered functionally literate, for instance. They’d lack the ability to reasonably get through a text using reading as a tool. Instead reading would be an obstacle.
They might know a few words they need to know, like writing their own name, or reading some road signs, but they’d be unable to get through a novel or textbook. They might even know how to recite the alphabet or do math.
I used to teach adult literacy in the US and I’ve met hundreds of illiterate adults. Most of our studies showed 87% literacy but I could believe 79% too depending on the methodology and definition of literate.
it’s too high for a functional literacy. Even in well educated country like Poland with 99% formal literacy the functional literacy reach around 60%, so in USA it bound to be even less.
That makes sense. I guess it depends on how well you have to be able to read. Id imagine a higher percentage could get buy by reading slowly and asking others about certain words but it would depend on the standard
Adults with the reading level of a small child, basically
English literacy skills sufficient to complete tasks that require comparing and contrasting information, paraphrasing, or making low-level inferences
Persons with very poor skills, for example, may be unable to determine the correct amount of medicine to give a child from information printed on the package
Have you seen the spelling and grammar on Facebook?
And it’s often not a complete inability to read. They might recognise the shapes of words without knowing how to really read it, like when you go on holiday to a foreign country and start to pick up the local words for bus station or toilets because they’re written everywhere.
People also tend to be able to hide illiteracy quite well, because they’re embarrassed about it. The system failed them as a child, but has also convinced them it’s their own fault.
Is the 79% literacy of who can read English or read period? 79% seems insanely low
It’s probably a measure of functional literacy, like the ability to read through a page of information and understand it fluently. Someone who is able to sound words out one by one wouldn’t be considered functionally literate, for instance. They’d lack the ability to reasonably get through a text using reading as a tool. Instead reading would be an obstacle.
They might know a few words they need to know, like writing their own name, or reading some road signs, but they’d be unable to get through a novel or textbook. They might even know how to recite the alphabet or do math.
I used to teach adult literacy in the US and I’ve met hundreds of illiterate adults. Most of our studies showed 87% literacy but I could believe 79% too depending on the methodology and definition of literate.
it’s too high for a functional literacy. Even in well educated country like Poland with 99% formal literacy the functional literacy reach around 60%, so in USA it bound to be even less.
Thanks, that’s depressing
That makes sense. I guess it depends on how well you have to be able to read. Id imagine a higher percentage could get buy by reading slowly and asking others about certain words but it would depend on the standard
Adults with the reading level of a small child, basically
Have you seen the spelling and grammar on Facebook?
And it’s often not a complete inability to read. They might recognise the shapes of words without knowing how to really read it, like when you go on holiday to a foreign country and start to pick up the local words for bus station or toilets because they’re written everywhere.
People also tend to be able to hide illiteracy quite well, because they’re embarrassed about it. The system failed them as a child, but has also convinced them it’s their own fault.
That does make sense I guess. I haven’t really thought very much about it. Thanks for elaborating