• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Kind of wish they would stop trying to push this as “editing”.

    If all you can do is draw on top of it, you’re not actually editing it.

    I’m not shaming them, I understand why they can’t have a full built-in PDF editor, but people that don’t know any better are going to open it up expecting an actual editor and be disappointed.

        • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s paid though, right? I don’t use Word, and if I wanted to I’d need to buy it. Firefox is free and accessible to everyone.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          But why? I’m getting the PDFs in my browser, so why not edit them in my browser? Most of the time it’s just a handful of fields and then I need to reupload it (loan forms, W-4, etc).

    • clairut@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      True. Many things are missing.

      My first impression was, it will be able to do real editing , editing what I don’t need with same font, size, colour at same place without worrying about alignment etc.

      Big disappointment.

  • TheFool@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you need to add stuff to a PDF document, now you can do that online with Firefox. Open the PDF in Firefox and click the Text or Draw buttons in the upper right corner to make changes to your document. Download the file to save it with your changes.

    Fill in forms online without printing and scanning

    We’ve all faced this: you need to fill in a form that is a PDF, but it isn’t editable. In the past, your only option was to print it on a dead tree, add things with ink, and then scan it back into your computer.

    No more! Now, all you need to do is edit the PDF online with Firefox, save it, and email it from your computer.

    Add text

    Open the PDF in Firefox. Click the Text button to choose a color and text size before selecting where on the document you wish to add text. It’s that easy!

    Add drawings (or your signature)

    Open the PDF in Firefox. Click the Draw icon to choose a color, thickness and opacity before then being able to draw on the document. It probably won’t be any messier than your usual signature!

    Add image with alt text

    Open the PDF in Firefox. Click the image icon, which will then prompt you to upload an image. Adjust size and placement of your image as needed. Click the “+Alt text” button on the image to add a photo description to make your PDF more accessible.

    Create a highlight

    Open the PDF in Firefox. Select the text you want to highlight, then click the highlight icon that appears below your selection, or right click to find the highlight option in the context menu. Click the icon in the top right to freehand highlight sections of the PDF.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    I just wish Mozilla got back to focus on making the best browser.

    PDF stuff is cool but not why I use a web browser.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      7 months ago

      Filling in PDF forms online is one of the things I would love to be able to do direct in my browser.

      • mindlight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Let’s hope that if they support the shit show XFA is, they manage to support it fully.

        The only one that seem to support it fully today is Adobe and I still haven’t been able to find any open source product that was able to close forms in PDFs.

    • schnurrito
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      Remember when we needed to use Adobe Reader (or maybe Okular etc.) to view PDFs?

      I think it is a very good thing that we can now do that in the web browser.

      • mindlight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That was 20 years ago. Numerous PDF readers has surfaced since then.

        PDF is not like HTML.PDF is a messy standard where you need Adobe products to support all the shit that a PDF could contain. There is no open source product that for example fully support PDF forms and therefore Mozilla won’t either.

        All in saying is that Firefox is a web browser and not a document viewer. Since Mozilla would go bankrupt in two hours if Google stopped showing them with a shitload of money, Mozilla would be wise to focus on the core.

        So if Google were to stop paying Mozilla for us to be able to use Firefox for free, we’re all running Chrome.

        • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          All in saying is that Firefox is a web browser and not a document viewer

          So what do you suppose an HTML document is?

          Hint: the clue is in the name.

          2nd hint: the first line of any well formed HTML file.

          • mindlight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            You obviously know very little about PDF since you’re trying to put it on the same level as HTML.

            The PDF files that we see in our daily life today is not even halfway as open as HTML is and dealing with them is not as easy as you think.

            Furthermore, you’re free to call Firefox a “document viewer”.

            I personally prefer a state of the art web browser and a state of the art PDF viewer more than one document viewer that only handles subsets of 2 document types.

            • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Chill Winston, no need to get so aggressive just because you were wrong about the browser not being a document viewer. Because that’s exactly what it is. That’s all. No attack on you, your preferences or ideology. Just facts.

              I’m clearly not as well versed on the minutia of PDFs as you are, but I am an expert on browsers and their capabilities as a document viewer.

              Your preferences are your own, and I am not here to refute them or change your mind. You keep trucking however you like.

              • mindlight@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                7 months ago

                You seeing me as aggressive just because I’m right about Firefox being a web browser is nothing I can do anything about and something you have to work with.

                Me and Mozilla will keep trucking and call Mozilla Firefox a Web Browser… Or as Wikipedia says:

                Mozilla Firefox, or simply Firefox, is a free and open-source web browser developed by the Mozilla Foundation and its subsidiary, the Mozilla Corporation.

                And you keep calling Firefox your banana or whatever. It’s ok. I promise to continue to not being aggressive about it.

                Banana or not, a document viewer / editor that handle a subset of two standards is not a very versatile document viewer / editor.

                So back to my original point: Since Mozilla doesn’t have a very stable business model it seems dangerous to focus on other things than making their web browser the best at browsing the web.

                Ps. It took us over 20 years to get rid of the cluster f***s Internet Explorer and Flash was and it seems we should have learned the lesson by now. Going down the same route as before, starting to support standards that rely on patents owned by a third party (Adobe in this case) is definitively not a death sentence in any way, but history has shown us that it’s a slippery slope that has many different paths and endings.

    • Zeroc00l@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The audacity of them adding features. I’m a bit disappointed Big Mozilla haven’t solely focused on what mindlight is using their browser for too (whatever that is).