• BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      6 months ago

      DOD doesn’t want to pay upkeep and it was designed for roadside bombs in remote mountains not Iranian drones.

      Might as well give it to the cops, in case one of their supporters accidentally hits it while trying to bomb a women’s shelter or something.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re specifically not to be used on roads because they don’t fit, rollover if sneezed at and destroy our roads but fuck it they’re police right?

          • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            I dunno, it might have to “monster truck” its way over all the other motor vehicles already parked in the bike lane.

        • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m confused about the design. If it’s designed for mountain areas but is top heavy and rolls easy, isn’t that a major design floor for an area where the terrain is likely to be steep from left to right in parts?

          Maybe my idea of terrain in mountainous areas is wrong.

          • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s designed to stay on roads.
            Those roads are natural choke points where bombs are often hidden on the ground, which results in a high and heavy design.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              MATV begs to differ. We always had the technology. We just wanted a cheap solution to stop taking so many casualties.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Correct, they move slow but they are quite explosion survivable past the original design.

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Tall but narrower than other options while having survivability in case of getting IED’d. I know HMMWVs are actually big but the MRAPs didn’t all have a much larger footprint.

            Fun fact though, they had to add a gunners harness because the gunners were more likely to die in a roll over. Armored plates all up over your back but you get crushed because the Specialist driving hasn’t even driven anything bigger than his Civic and doesn’t have enough hours dealing with actual Afghan roads.

        • BigPotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hey, you can easily get them up to 50mph on an airfield runway and feel the death rattle telling you to slow down. It’s basically all operator error.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is it “gifted” to them, or are they paying taxpayer dollars to purchase these war machines? When they’re turning our local communities into war zones, some of us might even question whether we should reduce their funding significantly if this is what they’re squandering our money on.

      Watch them cower inside of this vehicle, idling in the parking lot as a school shooter empties one magazine after another.