• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    And based on this list, some small parties actually have some seats and even have some mayors somewhere. So it seems like the vote is not 100% wasted.

    On the national level, it’s wasted. Essentially, the system used in the USA is called First Past The Post - the majority (or plurality) winner of the vote gets the office. No proportional representation. That means when there are two parties which are near clinching a majority (as in almost all national races here in the US), votes for a third party are wasted.

    • Instantnudel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      But isn’t that a big problem? This way, you always have to vote for the least bad outcome. Because as far as I often read, both aren’t that great. If everyone only votes for these two Partys, I would hardly actually call that a democratic choice, and you keep this Problem going and going this way. Nothing could ever change.

      Yes, as a silent 3rd Party voter it’s impossible to change anything. So you would need to have speak up. Speak about this problem. In my View, Americans are shooting in their own leg my hating everyone who is voting for something different.

      Wouldn’t it be better to have a third, or heck even a fourth party with seats?

      In Germany, our Government even is always formed by two parties together. I think this is really good. This way, one single ideology doesn’t have too much control over everything.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        But isn’t that a big problem?

        Yes.

        It’s made into an even bigger problem by the fact that the only third party candidates which consistently run for national office, the Libertarians and Greens, are both deeply unserious parties which focus most of their resources on making a ridiculous play for the presidency every four years instead of building up local support first.

        • Instantnudel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not all small parties that I see on the Wikipedia list even run in the elections? That’s weird, makes it look like they aren’t even trying. I think they should attend symbolic. Like “hey we are here. We exist” Just being on the Ballot also makes a difference.

          But yes, as you say, building up local support should be the first step. My Party lost the seat in the European Parliament, but we actually had many local Elections at the same time, and local we actually won new seats in some City Councils. I hope the people that got that seat will keep up good work and also speak about it, because most people don’t even notice anything that happens in their own Councils. That way, we maybe get more votes from people out of that city in bigger elections.