Yes it’s some-controversy propaganda and it is a heck a lot better than a multi billion arms sale presser that amerikkka puts out in it’s media.

xi-lib-tears

      • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        true. it will never be a money maker.

        the “profit” will be from delivering the world from fossil fuels and rare resources, empowering small nations to have complete energy freedom, and eventually setting humanity up on the path to true FALGSC

        • HexBroke [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          empowering small nations to have complete energy freedom

          Sorry but there’s just no way a small country is going to be able to effectively develop a nuclear fusion industry, it is incredibly complex demonstrated by the fact that we don’t actually have fusion yet.

          Definitely good for FALGSC and other applications that aren’t addressed by big grids, big wins and solar and big storage pumps

          Although we do already have the right sort of fusion to rid the world of fossil fuels posadist-nuke

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think that’s even a question if isn’t going to be profitable at the short, or long time, but that its success isn’t make other interests unprofitable, like in capitalist societies, so there’s no one with the power of the accumulated capital influencing tge government to cut it off. Imagine the green technologies we could have now, if wasn’t for the gas and oil industry sabotaging it for decades.