I stopped writing seriously about “AI” a few months ago because I felt that it was more important to promote the critical voices of those doing substantive research in the field.
But also because anybody who hadn’t become a sceptic about LLMs and diffusion models by the end of 2023 was just flat out wilfully ignoring the facts.
The public has for a while now switched to using “AI” as a negative – using the term “artificial” much as you do with “artificial flavouring” or “that smile’s artificial”.
But it seems that the sentiment might be shifting, even among those predisposed to believe in “AI”, at least in part.
Between this, and the rise of “AI-free” as a marketing strategy, the bursting of the AI bubble seems quite close.
Another solid piece from Bjarnason.
i just want to note that the same hyper-pro-AI consulting company from that article extruded an article about AI-generated pharmaceuticals https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/10619179