Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
thereās so much quantum woo in that article I want to sneer at, but I donāt know anywhere close to enough about quantum physics to do so without showing my entire ass
To me, the most sneerable thing in that article is where they assume a mechanical brain will evolve from ChatGPT and then assume a sufficiently large quantum computer to run it on. And then start figuring out how to port the future mechanical brain to the quantum computer. All to be able to run an old thought experiment that at least I understood as highlighting the absurdity of focusing on the human brain part in the collapse of a wave function.
Once we build two trains that can run near the speed of light we will be able to test some of Einsteinās thought experiments. Better get cracking on how we can get enough coal onboard to run the trains long enough to get the experiments done.
Well a good thing to remember re quantum mechanics, Schrƶdinger Cat is intended as a thought experiment showing how dumb the view on QM was. So it is always a bit funny to see people extrapolate from that thought experiment without acknowledging the history and issues with it. (But I think that also depends on the various interpretations, and this means Iām showing a cheekily high amount of ass here myself).
Pretty much any mention of a thought experiment in the wild gets my hackles up. āIsnāt it cool that the cat is alive and dead at the same time?ā Shut up! Shut up shut up shut up!!! Tho to be honest it might just be schrodingerās cat that comes up. I wish theyād leave the poor cat alone, and stop trying to poison it.
I have a whole series of rants about that cat, starting with how it doesnāt illuminate anything about quantum theory specifically ā as opposed to probabilistic or stochastic theories in general ā and culminating in āHey, maybe we should stop naming things after pedo creeps.ā
Not surprised that a guy who thinks about poisoning cats is a creep!
What really gets me is that we never look past Schrƶdingerās version of the cat. I want us to talk about Bellās Cat, which cannot be alive or dead due to a contradiction in elementary linear algebra and yet reliably is alive or dead once the box opens. (I guess technically it should be āaliveā, ādeadā, or āundeadā, since weāre talking spin-1 particles.)
There are some interesting ideas in that general direction (wrapping Bell inequalities within different new types of thought experiment, etc.), but some of the people involved have done rather a lot of overselling, and now bringing in talk of āAIā just obscures the whole situation. Which was already obscure enough.
If you want a serious discussion of interpretations of quantum mechanics, here is a transcript of a lecture āQuantum Mechanics in Your Faceā which has the best explanation Iāve ever seen. Iād recommend the first 6 of Peter Shorās Quantum Computation notes (donāt worry theyāre each very short) for just enough background to understand the transcript.
awesome! these are going straight to the list of things I should be reading