yes this one’s a sneerclub

  • imadabouzu@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why so general? The multi-agent dynamical systems theory needed to heal internal conflicts such as auto-immune disorders may not be so different from those needed to heal external conflicts as well, including breakdowns in social and political systems.

    This isn’t, an answer to the question why so general? This is aspirational philosophical goo. “multi-agent dynamical systems theory” => you mean any theory that takes composite view of a larger system? Like Chemistry? Biology?Physics? Sociology? Economics? “Why so general” may as well be “why so uncommitted?”

    I feel bayesian rationalism has basically missed the point of inference and immediately fallen into the regression to the mean trap of “the general answer to any question shouldn’t say anything in particular at all.”

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Saying anything in particular makes you open to fact-based criticism — I mean, it is object-level and bad, instead of meta-level and good.

      • imadabouzu@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, that’s a good call out, I do feel the meta is good obsession is borderline definitely cultish.

        There’s a big difference between a committed scientists doing emperical work on specific mechanisms saying something like “wow, isn’t it cool how considering a broader perspective of how unrelated parts work together to create this newly discovered set of specifics?” and someone who is committed anti-institutional saying “see how by me taking your money and offering vague promises of immortal we are all enriched?”