• PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      It also depends on if you mean progressive relative to the times vs progressive on a direct platform comparison.

      Even the most progressive historical presidents were disgustingly conservative compared to today, in many aspects.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s usually more sensible to analyze historical context, as everything is a product of its time and conditions.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe for academic purposes.
          But from a more “absolute” perspective, it still means he’d be making progress, just not as much as we’d like (although personally I’m not convinced of that).

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            What is “progress?” I wouldn’t consider Biden to be making progress if the overall trend is still negative, and the root cause isn’t being addressed. To be somewhat fair, I don’t believe the Democrats can do what needs to be done while maintaining their position, similar to what is happening to the Labor Party in the UK from its conception to now.

            Historical progress is relevant because it is a good indicator of what people were fighting for and against. The French Revolution was progressive against the Monarchy, even if the resulting French society would not be considered progressive today.