vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoTrump Media reports $16 million loss for quarter as revenue fallswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square74linkfedilinkarrow-up1621arrow-down17
arrow-up1614arrow-down1external-linkTrump Media reports $16 million loss for quarter as revenue fallswww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square74linkfedilink
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up49·2 years agodoesnt he have a 450m bill due soon? e. just checked, not til after an appeal in sept.
minus-squareInternetUser2012@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoThe one he owes the lady that sued his balls off? Or the Russians?
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 years agothis is the whole ‘i lied about everything i own in new york’ thing
minus-squareInternetUser2012@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoOh, shit, forgot about that one too. He’s so screwed and so deserving of it.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agothat one he has to put the cash up in escrow before he can appeal.
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 years agohe already did, and the fucking let him squeak by on a 175m bond from an agency that wasnt technically financially able to do it. because rich people have different rules.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoNot just financially unable, legally unable. They weren’t authorized to issue surety bonds in New York.
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoha! I had actually had typed out ‘legally’ but changed it. legality is irrelevant if its allowed to stand and it is standing, isnt it?
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years ago“When the president does it, that means it is not illegal” also applies to former presidents, I guess.
minus-squarebarsquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoOh did they finally make him put in money instead of lowering the requirements and giving him more chances?
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agothey lowered the bond to 175m, and let him used an illegal-in-new-york bond agency.
doesnt he have a 450m bill due soon?
e. just checked, not til after an appeal in sept.
The one he owes the lady that sued his balls off? Or the Russians?
this is the whole ‘i lied about everything i own in new york’ thing
Oh, shit, forgot about that one too. He’s so screwed and so deserving of it.
that one he has to put the cash up in escrow before he can appeal.
he already did, and the fucking let him squeak by on a 175m bond from an agency that wasnt technically financially able to do it.
because rich people have different rules.
Not just financially unable, legally unable. They weren’t authorized to issue surety bonds in New York.
ha! I had actually had typed out ‘legally’ but changed it. legality is irrelevant if its allowed to stand and it is standing, isnt it?
“When the president does it, that means it is not illegal” also applies to former presidents, I guess.
Oh did they finally make him put in money instead of lowering the requirements and giving him more chances?
they lowered the bond to 175m, and let him used an illegal-in-new-york bond agency.