You must log in or register to comment.
Experimentalists: understood, say no more.
Theorists: ok, show me the Hamiltonian…including the noise terms.
Too real
Sources of error: psychosomatic popping noise interfered with measurements when viewing image
Nah… It’s just that “usually calculations overestimate the experimental values”.
Where was the experiment run? On a battlefield?
Setting up a bird listening device a few meters off an active runway and no filter for engine sounds.
Play back is of course volume tuned for the bird chirps when processing data
- Hey boss, we have sincere troubles, SNR is off by too much.
- how much?
- 20dB
- ah, then we’re good, that’s so ridiculous it’s def. a gain problem in your measurement setup
The funny thing about RF work is how casually a few orders of magnitudes gets thrown around. 10 dB fudge factors for assorted losses are quite common.
