• unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Nah thats not fair to the BBC. They were fairly neutral on this and refrained from calling hamas a terrorist org until they were heavily pressured into doing so. They constantly get bullied by zionists for not being pro israel enough. Yes they could do better, but they are much more neutral than most.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m referring to examples like this headline where they completely left out the perpetrator of an atrocity.

      Even the ‘fixed’ headline makes it sound like the dog somehow got loose instead of being intentionally sicced on the victim.

      • unexposedhazard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Damn that is more examples than i would have thought. Sad to see :/