The head of Telegram, Pavel Durov, has been charged by the French judiciary for allegedly allowing criminal activity on the messaging app but avoided jail with a €5m bail.

The Russian-born multi-billionaire, who has French citizenship, was granted release on condition that he report to a police station twice a week and remain in France, Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau said in a statement.

The charges against Durov include complicity in the spread of sexual images of children and a litany of other alleged violations on the messaging app.

His surprise arrest has put a spotlight on the criminal liability of Telegram, the popular app with around 1 billion users, and has sparked debate over free speech and government censorship.

  • Clot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is that the point here? Telegram is not a messaging app, it have that functionality but it does not revolve around that. And there is e2ee if you enable it. Thanks

    • unknowing8343
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      But Telegram IS a messaging app? Their motto is literally “a new era of messaging”.

      • Clot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, but it’s not it’s only functionality, unlike signal. Also how is durovs arrest can be justified by saying “telegram aint e2ee”? Signal bros are something else.

        • unknowing8343
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m just calling out your phrase saying that Telegram is not a messaging app, when it is. That is all.

        • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Also how is durovs arrest can be justified by saying “telegram aint e2ee”?

          No one here has said or implied that.