• ColeSloth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    It genuinely seems asinine to me to call the floor above the ground floor the first floor.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would be if you did it in the US, where everybody knows the ground floor is the first floor. Here in Europe, it’s just taught that way from birth, so everybody knows that the first floor is above ground and there’s no confusion.

      • ColeSloth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I understand not getting confused. That doesn’t mean calling the second floor that you put your feet on “the first floor” makes sense.

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It makes perfect sense if you learn it that way! It’s hardly asinine in any case. I don’t think it’s ever caused a problem, except for Americans in Europe getting confused by it or vice versa.

        • fallingcats
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It makes total sense of you don’t consider the first level a real floor because it’s just, like, ground (duh). /hj