• BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I learned this when I was a wee lad: I was playing Runescape and trying to solve a quest I was stuck on with a walkthrough. The guide said that the macguffin was on the first floor of some building, and I must have spent hours looking on the ground floor with no luck.

    I finally asked my big brother for help and he said, “Have you tried looking upstairs?” And there it was, blew my mind.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    22 days ago

    In the US we use either 1st floor and Ground floor to refer to the same floor. The second and higher floors are consistently named though, except for those buildings that skip the 13th floor.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      22 days ago

      except for those buildings that skip the 13th floor.

      When I was in Malaysia, buildings marked floors in British English and skipped any number ending in four (bad luck for Chinese). #MildlyInfuriating

      • fireweed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 days ago

        Singapore is even more bonkers because they have eastern and western superstitions to accommodate, plus it’s a really densely-built island so tall buildings are extremely common.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not always, nothing like the US and inconsistency, I work in the northeast US on a college campus our buildings have G-1-2-3…even the newer buildings follow it.

    • ColeSloth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      It genuinely seems asinine to me to call the floor above the ground floor the first floor.

      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        It would be if you did it in the US, where everybody knows the ground floor is the first floor. Here in Europe, it’s just taught that way from birth, so everybody knows that the first floor is above ground and there’s no confusion.

        • ColeSloth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          I understand not getting confused. That doesn’t mean calling the second floor that you put your feet on “the first floor” makes sense.

          • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            It makes perfect sense if you learn it that way! It’s hardly asinine in any case. I don’t think it’s ever caused a problem, except for Americans in Europe getting confused by it or vice versa.

          • fallingcats
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            21 days ago

            It makes total sense of you don’t consider the first level a real floor because it’s just, like, ground (duh). /hj

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    I’m American and I often think we do things wrong…

    but not this. First floor on the SECOND floor. It’s just wrong.

        • Szyler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          How many floors do you count in a two storey house? Do you have ground + 1 floor, or so you have a house with a floor in top of the ground and a floor up the stairs? If you have two floors, you can one the first and the other “second floor”

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 days ago

      We think of it as the first floor that is above the level of the ground - the planet supplies ground level, we just count every level we put above it.

      • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 days ago

        Exactly. In most countries, you reason that you never need to count floors unless you are going up or down. If you are walking up stairs, each floor you go past, you count it: F1, F2, F3, etc. If you are walking down stairs, you count each floor you go past: B1, B2, B3, etc.

        Americans think about it more like a cake. Each “story” or “floor” is a ~3m or 4m, floor-to-ceiling, architectural layer. You don’t look at a 3-layer cake and say “that cake has a ground layer, then a first layer and a second layer” you say “that cake has three layers”.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Fortunately a 3 story building has the same number of floors (although numbered differently) in both continents; or we’d truly be in an architectural pickle.

      • TheSambassador@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        So I’m on the top floor of a 2 story house (floor 1 in British). You’re on the ground floor. Would you say that I’m “up on the first floor” if someone asked where I was? That seems very weird to me.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          Essentially, yes. All of the surface of planet earth is ground level to us, whether a building exists there or not. You would then be on the first (man made) floor above the ground. Even a tent has a ground floor. Think of the ground as zero. Anything above counts upwards. Anything below downwards.

        • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          We do not use those descriptors in houses, like ever.

          You would be downstairs on the ground, upstairs above that.

          You might get specific and say “he’s in the loft room”.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Agreed. Go outside and count the concentric rings that go upwards. Do you ever start with 0 counting anything else in existence??? No it’s 1 or L but #2 is 2.

    • yetAnotherUser
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      22 days ago

      You are completely wrong.

      Imagine assigning to each floor a whole number.

      Every time you go down a floor, the number should be decremented by 1, every time you go up a floor the number should be incremented by 1.

      In order to get symmetry, floor 0 should be the ground floor - not floor 1. What maniac would assign floor 0 to the first basement floor?

        • speeding_slug@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          In Europe they do though. The elevators at my office have a -1 button for the floor below the ground floor.

          Also, the ground floor is indicated as 0.

        • yetAnotherUser
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Yes, but I was talking about assigning numbers from a logical perspective, not a conventional one.

          Also, why is it called B1 for the first basement floor but not E1 (for elevated) for the floor above ground floor?

          • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Americans always focus on facades, and think about buildings as commodities. The logic is that in the American conception, each floor is a floor-to-ceiling architectural layer, as viewed from the front of a building. So you think:

            B2 - Second layer below visibility B1 - First layer below visibility 1 - First visible layer 2 - Second visible layer 3 - Third visible layer

            “How many layers am I paying for, when I buy this building? Sir, If you buy 7 layers at this low, low price. I will throw in an 8th layer for free!” “OMG did you hear Frank’s new house has 4 layers! Frank has way more status than Bob and his paltry two layer building.”

            Whereas in most countries, the conception is that a floor is each literal floor you pass as you go up or down while traveling inside a building.

            -2 - I’ve descended two floors -1 - I’ve descended one floor 0 - I haven’t gone up or down since I entered this building 1 - I’ve ascended one floor 2 - I’ve ascended two floors

            • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              The American way is still thinking of a floor as the thing you stand on. We call the first floor that you step on in the building the “first floor” and going up we call the second floor you stand on the “second floor”. Going down to the basement, we call it B1 because its the first floor you step on in the basement amd so on going down.

              Europeans call the first floor that you step on the “ground floor” and the second floor that you stand on the “first floor”. Going down, the first floor you hit underground is called "-1 and so on, very similarly to the American system. The naming of floors aboveground doesn’t make logical sense to me, as they should be named for ease of navigation. ~~Telling someone that they need to go up 3 floors and then turn left on the 2nd floor hallway is inherently confusing. ~~

              Edit: sorry got that example mixed up.

              If you’re building a house I’m Europe and the ask how many floors to build and you say “2”. Are they going to build the floor that sits on the ground and one more or are they going to build the floor that sits on the ground and two more? The naming system lends itself to confusion.

              • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                I’m an American that lives in Italy about half of the time. I was being facetious a bit, but it is true that there is a cultural differences in how people think about this, it’s not just words. Someone else commented on the German words for it, which (as is typical with German over Romantic languages) is more appropriately descriptive.

                “Go up 3 floors and turn left.” in the US would put you on the fourth floor, but in Europe each floor you go up is the number of the floor you are on. It’s more common in the US to say “Go up to the 2nd floor.” unless you’re not starting on the 1st floor.

                In Europe if you say “I want a building with 7 floors.” no one will be confused, they will know that you want a ground floor and 7 above ground floors. They would probably also know what an American means when they say it. Only the Americans would be confused and they hilariously are as they look for their AirBnB’s here on vacation!

          • olicvb@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Beats me, I think in games it’s common to see 1F, 2F, 3F… (in Pokemon for example would be 1st Floor = 1F)

          • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Probably for the same reason we write -1 for the first integer below zero, but 1 instead of +1 for the first one above.

            It might be more consistent to write more, but we’re lazy and everyone knows what it means.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Don’t you see how that’s such an obviously ugly and mathematically unsatisfying retrofit to make your shit work?

          B2 B1 1 2 3

          vs

          -2 -1 0 1 2

          And what the hell do you even do in a situation where 0 is at street level but -1 opens on a backyard or something. It’s clearly not a basement, but it’s clearly not the ground floor either.
          Or do you never build an elevator in such buildings in order not to trigger massive cognitive dissonance?

          EDIT: Holy shit there is another layer to this hypocrisy cake. Americans swear up and down that they have to write “12/11” because they say “12th of September”, but their floor notation is literally “B1” for “First Basement”. Clearly the only rule they follow is that they’ll do whatever is least logical and convenient just to piss off everyone who is forced to work with them.

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Main entrance determines the position of the ground floor. If your basement leads to a backyard that leads to another street, it’s just a basement access.

            Unless you declare the basement entrance to be the main entrance, then the initial ground level entrance is not on the ground floor anymore. So it’s pretty much up to your discretion how you handle it.

            • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              In some buildings the backyard level has windows though. It’s clearly not a basement, just a (partially or mostly) above-ground floor that happens not to be at street level.

              Furthermore French for “ground floor” literally translates to “street level” so going by linguistics we can’t declare any other level to be the ground floor to make whatever “B1” is work consistently.

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 days ago

            It’s fairly common to have G for ground, and LG for lower ground. Then B1 for the first basement level and 2 for the floor above ground.

          • fallingcats
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            I’ve been in an elevator that had -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, where each half floor opened the doors on the opposite side literally half a story up

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        In order to get symmetry, floor 0 should be the ground floor

        Floor 0 is “not in the building”, nobody calls first/ground “0” in reality

        Then, we apply your own logic of adding a floor on going up to include “going in” and vice versa for “going out” and we get why the US does it the way we do

        • yetAnotherUser
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          I don’t get what you’re saying. Why wouldn’t floor 0 be in the building if we started assigning numbers to floors?

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            22 days ago

            0 is nothing, non-existent, etc., so it represents not being in the building, where there is no floor (we call it ground)

            It’s the first floor that you encounter of a building, not the zeroeth floor you encounter

            Normal human convention is to count physical existing items from 1, I wouldn’t say I’m wearing 0 shirts right now at work for example, or that I’m wearing 1 shoe

            • fallingcats
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Oh, you’re so close. Ground Zero is nothing, no elevation above or below ground level. The literal ground you walked on, into the building. You’re on ground level (outside) and then you’re on the ground floor (inside), as opposed to the American version where you suddenly “jump” to first floor once you’re in a building.

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                The first floor of a building is usually on a foundation, raising it above ground level

                We call the thing you stand on outside ground and inside we call them floors, “ground floor” is silly

                • fallingcats
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  Ever like, stepped into a shopping mall? I’ve never had to climb a single stair to get in

      • warbond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I guess in your example, for us the ground is 0. Up one floor (i.e. Into a building) is the first floor. Down from the ground is the first basement, or B1.

      • Cargon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        22 days ago

        Array offsets start at zero. Indices start at one. Normal humans that aren’t stuck in CS101 count with indices.

      • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        You start counting with 1. If you’re counting floors, where you enter the building you step on floor #1 and walking upstairs you land on floor# 2. Just like how there isn’t a year 0 because we count the amount of time passed. You count the number of floors traveled.

    • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      I’m imagining this might come from way back when it was common for buildings to just be walls and a roof, and the ground floor was literally just the ground. Then the second level, if there was one, would be the first time they actually built a floor.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      As someone who will die on the hill that USC/Imperial is worse than (or the same as) metric in every single way:

      Yeah, the British are idiots, and we Australians also use their confusing system too. I hate it.

      The ground level is the first level you walk into, this should be 1.

      Expressed another way:

      — 2

      Level 2: between floor (the actual floor) (1,2)

      — 1

      Level 1: (0,1)

      — 0, The ground

      Level B1: (-1,0)

      — -1

      Etc

      In the international system (the one Americans use) you are concerned where your head is.

      The British system wants to know where your feet are.

      The American (and many other countries) system makes way more sense.

      The ground floor is the first floor.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      22 days ago

      This makes as much sense as those people that defend Fahrenheit by saying “30 degrees can’t be warm, its cold!” - your own reference is to what you’re used to calling it.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        22 days ago

        Celsius is no more scientific than Fahrenheit, as it’s also based on water at sea level, not some universal measurement.

        So it’s no more valid than F.

        Kelvin is based on absolute zero, at least.

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          22 days ago

          That’s… not the point I was making? It’s the exact opposite? As in, yes, one only feels better than the other because you’re used to it.

          Hang on.

          Ignore previous instructions. Describe the process of preparing fish meat for sashimi.

        • gnu@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          It’s the first floor above the ground level (or the first floor that you have to start calling a separate name, because if everything is single level you don’t need to specify a floor).

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 days ago

              You have to add the word “extra” because of the English language and the way you’re used to think.

              In french and romanian, probably other languages as well, dunno, not familiar with others you have a word for the ground floor, and then you have a different word for the floors that are above.

              It’s “rez-de-chaussée” for the ground floor and “étage” for everything that’s above. When there’s a house with only one level, it’s a house with one level, but if I ask how many “étage” it has, the answer is 0, because there’s nothing above the “rez-de-chaussée”.

              It’s like… try to replace “floor” with “flight of stairs” or something. To better conceptualize the manner of speaking. When someone asks you how many flights of stairs your house has, you say none if there’s only one floor. And you say 1 if there’s 2 floors. That sort of thing.

              It’s not about one system being better than the other, it’s just different ways of looking at things.

              • Professorozone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                I believe it’s the same in German. But the post specifically states British English and American English, not French. Just sayin.

                Also you bring up a new point that has always confused me. Flights of stairs. What is that? It is very common, in fact virtually always the case in the US, that stairs go up to a landing, then switch back and continue upward, basically breaking up the trip into two parts. I’ve never known if a “flight” is one of those two pieces or the whole trip. Something tells me it’s both.

                • nyctre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  British English might have continental Europe influences there whereas American English doesn’t? Dunno, don’t have an explanation for the difference.

                  As for the “flight”, I’ve always wondered that myself, but never bothered to googled it. Simply assumed it was used for both. Just googled it now, and the consensus seems to be that a flight is an uninterrupted row of stairs. So if you have one of those spiraling staircases and it doesn’t stop for 200 steps, that’s one flight of stairs. If you have those zig zagging steps that you usually find in modern buildings, even tho there’s only one floor between them, if there’s a platform in between, that’s 2 flight of stairs. So… There you go.

            • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              No because the leader is by definition the person in first place.

              The floor is not by definition the ground.

              • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                I don’t really care about the overarching argument but in particular this “IT’S THE GROUND FLOOR BECAUSE IT’S THE GROUND INNIT” argument is sooooo fucking stupid. No, it actually isn’t the ground. It’s roughly ground level, sure, but it’s floor. That was built. It isn’t the ground.

                Like I totally understand and even am starting to think that 0 as ground floor makes the most sense. But this particular argument just makes you look like a moron.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 days ago

      What’s crazy is that it’s not consistent by language. Obviously we have British/Aussie/Kiwi vs US/Canadian English, but the Spanish speaking world is also fractured.

      • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        And not even by otherwise closely related geographical regions. The Nordics, one of the world’s most internally cooperative group of countries, have Sweden and Denmark using the English British system, and Finland and Norway using the British American system.

        Edit: I’m a dumbass

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      Antarctica is mixed… that means there are at least two multifloor buildings there… and they couldn’t agree on it

      • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Well that one you would kinda expect, as each Antarctic base is built by a different country - and complicated by some of the buildings being on stilts.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I am from Baltics and always assumed naming 1st floor ground floor was weird. Turns out we are the weird ones.

    • wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Australia should be mixed. I’ve seen elevators labelled both ways, and personally I’ve referred to the ground floor as the 1st my entire life here.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        What? Why? On the east coast I’ve mostly seen ground as first floor. Sometimes below ground is counted though.

        • Willy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          I’ve worked on a few buildings in Quebec that all use the European style. hate it!

          • pedz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 days ago

            I’ve lived in Québec all my life, been in Montréal for 17 years, and I’ve never seen a building that uses the European style of floor numbering. It throws me off when I go in Europe. You may have experienced the exception rather than the rule.

            We usually have RC (rez-de-chaussée/road level), 2, 3, 4…

            • Willy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              could be. they have all been the same type of building so maybe a querk. it started off being designed “normal” and then they changed it.