• OozingPositron@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For me they weren’t allowed in Calc I, II, III, Alg I, II and Differential equations. Every other class pretty much required it.

    if there’s one thing language models suck at, it’s doing basic math.

    If you’re using a GPT 3.5 turbo level models, sure. Synthetic data is perfect for teaching LLMs, o1 will be good enough up to Calc III IMO, maybe even better.

    The only thing I don’t like about this is that it uses a TI, yikes.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      LLMs do suck at math, if you look into it, the o1 models actually escape the LLM output and write a python function to calculate the output, I’ve been able to break their math functions by asking for functions that use math not in the standard Python library.

      I know someone also wrote a wolfram integration to help solve LLMs math problems.

    • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They let us use them for all my college math classes.

      They really don’t help much at all if you don’t understand the math, and if you do understand, you don’t need the calculator most of the time.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Don’t know about university math, but this applied to a lot of the stuff in my last years of school. Since we always had a part where you were required to solve everything without a calculator you had to be able to do everything without it. For algebra and Calculus it just meant that you were able to do the math more efficiently. For statistics the calculator was basically useless, since it didnt help you if you didnt knew what you had to do, what was basically the only hard part of it.