• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thinking you are always right is one of the surest signs you’ve fallen down a propaganda rabbithole.

    • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thinking you are always right is one of the surest signs you’ve fallen down a propaganda rabbithole.

      What? …

      Do you think you’re wrong about things and not change your opinion to be the right one?

      This makes no sense.

      You should always strive to be right.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Strive, yes. But thinking you’ve already arrived at such perfection indicates a fundamental weakness in critical thinking.

        • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Exaggerative jokes are illegal in “memes”?

          Dialectical and historical materialism is, in my opinion, the best way to analyze the world and therefore leads to the proper conclusion quite often. Definitely more often than other ideologies/ways of examining things.

          In comparison to people who follow other ways of examining things we are “always right”, this doesn’t mean I truly think following DiMat makes you omniscient.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Omniscient is a bit of an exaggeration, I think, this is more about a belief in a philosophy, it’s about opinions. You can certainly have yours, no question, I would simply be wary and make sure the same standards of critical thinking are being applied to things we like and find agreeable as things we dislike and find disagreeable.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The analytical tools of Marxism-Leninism do make it easier for Marxist-Leninists to be correct. If you disagree with that, you should probably read Marx, Engels, and Lenin.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree. He made great contributions to theory. Foundations of Leninism is great - and he’s a really good writer on top of it. Unsurprising as he was a voracious reader of Marxist theory.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Dialectical and Historical Materialism is a good text as well as Marxism and the National Question. Stalin’s writing style is surprisingly gentle and clear, as opposed to Marx’s literary style, Engels’ flowery style, Lenin’s angry shitposter style, or Mao’s straightforward and direct style.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              I actually prefer Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy, it helped me greatly with comprehending dialectical and historical materialism. Dialectical and Historical Materialism is good, but Elementary Principles of Philosophy breaks the subject into easily digestible building blocks.

          • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Dialectical and historical materialism is, in my opinion, one of the best texts for an introduction to Marxism-leninism.

            Id read Some of the other more recommended stuff like Principles of Communism, the Manifesto, etc and had vague ideations.

            But I found that text on my own while looking into “Stalinism” and it just made everything “click”.

            Read Stalin 🗿

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              I will always push Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy whenever Dialectical and Historical Materialism is brought up. I prefer it over Dialectical and Historical Materialism greatly, it is more in-depth and breaks the subject down into smaller bites.

        • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You get that this is a meme, and that “all the time” is commonly understood to mean “very often” in practical terms, right? If I said to you “that guy is getting high all the time” would you well akshually me about how he’s not literally taking one endless bong rip 24 hours a day, or would you intuitively understand what I was saying and move on? Ironically, you’ve chosen to interpret this in very literal, black and white terms.

          Of course nobody is right about absolutely everything. But when you keep correctly calling the outcomes of wars before they start while everyone else screams and sneers that your accurate analysis makes you some kind of enemy agent, before reality forces those same people to turn around a year or two later and admit exactly what you were saying, only for nobody to learn anything and the cycle to begin again… shit starts to feel like a burden.

          • Vuraniute@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            well this is politics… semantics matter, “tankies” (whatever that term means anymore) are right about a lot of things, sure, but theyre no prophets.

                • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Bro, the only thing resembling an argument with this meme that you and one other liberal has been able to muster has been “um, well askhually you’re not literally omniscient”. Like at this point you’re clearly just looking for anything to grasp onto. If you’re saying to someone “well you’re not literally right all the time, just about all the important shit” then you’re just squirming around. It’s that weird “ah, touche” energy that your redditor types bring whenever you’re wrong about something but want to carve out a little tiny technicality where you can continue to not confront it.