• TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I do think that the substances have important differences on top of the competency gap between countries.

    One of these is made from one plant, often imported. The other can be made by anyone with a waterproof container and literally any plant.

    The one that’s easier to make is also ingrained in society as a way to form bonds with ones fellows by letting your guard down in a social environment, while the other basically removed you from society so the number and type of person who’s going to resist the prohibition is very different.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, there’s that aspect as well. Alcohol is just a byproduct of a biological process. Banning alcohol is on par with banning plants or banning compost. Likewise, banning marijuana is a fool’s errant because cannabis is a hardy plant that’s easy to grow. It’s like trying to ban an invasive species. Once you move to stuff like cocaine or heroin, it becomes easier to target them because they are synthetic products that have chemical precursors. You don’t even have to ban the actual drug but instead target the precursors required to manufacture the drug. This would be ideal because it targets drug production instead of personal use.