• P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m surprised that fucker doesn’t have a yacht yet. But I guess why buy one when you can ride on all of your friends yachts?

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are oiling themselves up to ready their bodies for their gun lobby masters. Seek out the greasiest justice and there you will find the Chosen One who will bring further imbalance to the Force.

        • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s never been about the money, that’s just an easy scapegoat for someone not wanting to admit that they lost on any given issue. It’s really easy to say “evil corporations bought the law/result they wanted” than admit that a highly engaged voting base was behind it.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just guessing, but maybe the gun lobby is not bigger because the voter base is already big and easy to move, so they don’t need to lobby politicians when they can treat them to be voted out.

        • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s absolutely it, before the NRA gave up on promoting gun rights and imploded its political power never came from “buying politicians with industry money.” It came from a large pool of highly active voters with a shared primary issue. Their report card was more effective than any donation or individual campaign. Mobilizing large groups of voters is far more powerful than deep pockets. That’s also why nothing has changed since their collapse, pro-gun voters had been jumping ship to more effective groups for more than two election cycles now. “Defeating the NRA” didn’t result in a gun control win because by the end the NRA’s corruption did more to hurt gun rights than anything Bloomberg could buy; ripping that bandaid off entirely allowed the community to rebound even harder.

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We have examined our behavior thoroughly and come to the conclusion that we have done nothing wrong.

    Corollary: we never do anything wrong

    Second corollary: we are incapable of doing anything wrong

    Third corollary: Leo, you got any more of them luxury vacations?

  • ColeSloth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Countersuit twenty billion for all the illegal drugs from Mexico that fuel their need for the guns.

    • courval@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Counter counter sue the war on drugs that fuels the US need for drugs from Mexico

      • ColeSloth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well shit. At that point it becomes silly to think you can sue another country for money over illegal activities, doesn’t it?