• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Are we having a debate or an interview? … Oh you’re going to fact-check me during the interview? This is adorable.”

    Are the cons so stupid as to think that their constant whining about fact-checking is not a signifier (to all normal people, which excludes the magabrained of course) that they just want their LIES to go completely unchecked?

    I know to their in-group narratives, “fact checking” is right in line with all the other Faux Cinematic Universe (FCU) bullshit like “OMG, we are soooo censored on Big Tech! I’m being shadow-banned if I don’t have millions of followers and it’s my RIGHT to spread nonsense on other people’s platform and not have it demonetized” and so on…

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m not body-shaming or saying that every woman has to be that mythical “10” or anything (and I’m not either), but I genuinely find her unattractive. Like, her body’s fine, but her perpetual sneer and entitled, hateful attitude are such a turn-off. Not that she’s offering, but I literally wouldn’t fuck with her for any amount of time…

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I really don’t like the idea of objectifying politicians like this, but, uh, sometimes that expression is part of it.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    mean and angry must just be who Lauren Boebert is

    Also she switched districts because she was going to lose. She’s corrupt. Dumber than owlshit. And a loose cannon. Republicans should be shedding her, but who can afford to lose a vote these days. Fuckos.