• Phineaz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    See, out of a somewhat displaced curiosity, I’d actually like to see that. Would it turn out the “same” as previous mainly patriarchic autocracies? Would it collapse? Any interesting policies?

    • jmcs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ask Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina was widely considered to be an autocrat.

        • jmcs
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          To put it mildly. But what are few massacres and disappearances between friends.

          And in democracies you also have examples like Thatcher. The problem with the patriarchy is the patriarchy in general, not the genitals of the person in charge.