• brown567@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s like what I say to bother botanists:

    If half of the fruits with “berry” in their name don’t fit your definition of berry, you need a new definition

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      What if I told you that words can have different meanings in different contexts? Just because the same word can be used to refer to different things depending on whether its used in everyday or scientific speech doesn’t mean either usage is “wrong”.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        Doesn’t change that it was a bad idea to borrow a generic term for small sweet fruits to refer to a specific botanical feature. Not just bad, but completely unnecessary and frankly, simply, a bit stupid.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well, no, there’s nothing wrong with the definition of berry, but there would be something wrong about a botanist being annoyed with someone using the colloquial definition of berry.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Pretty sure botanists are aware that the same word can have different meaning outside of their scientific field. The people actually bothered by this are pedants who read about it on the internet, not people who studied botany.