• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Where did they say the intention is for a third party to win this election?

    Also just because you don’t understand the conversation doesnt mean you should be sarcastic and rude. Overaggressive democrat voters is sort of the joke here in the first place.

    • Tartas1995
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are right… They talking about voting for Harris would be like cutting of a hand and implying that voting for trump is like cutting of a arm; and instead of choosing one of them, one should fight the System; certainly doesn’t carry the implication that one should vote third party.

      But I am wondering what am I not understanding about the conversation?

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are multiple ways to “fight”, third party is one version of it. Obviously each group is going to think their plan makes most sense.

        The bottom line is we all agree its a broken system run by psychopathic people, so maybe don’t point the blame at those who are trying to change things in good faith.

        • Tartas1995
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Good read but not really a response to what I said or what you said. I assume our conversation ended. Have a nice day

        • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can change things in good faith, when it is possible. At this point in the election, it is not.