The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 9 hours agoStuck in the middle with youlemmy.worldimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageStuck in the middle with youlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 9 hours agomessage-square148fedilink
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down6·5 hours ago TL;DR? Why not just go watch another five second video of a kitten with its head in a toilet roll, or a 140 character description of a meal your friend just stuffed in their mouth. “nom nom”. This blog post is not for you. wow, this some next level obnoxious boomer shit.
minus-squareDerHaseWillSchmako@feddit.orglinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up1·28 minutes agoIf you are offended by this, then you obviously didn’t read the article.
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·46 minutes agoIn the sense that I don’t believe the people described exist in any significant quantity, yes.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agothere is no statement there so I don’t know what you mean by “incorrect”. all i see is someone who doesn’t know how people use tldr.
minus-squaremasterofn001@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 hours agoWas it too long for you and you didn’t read it? In that case …This blog post is not for you. That’s what the question mark does. It marks a question. RTFA? RTFA!
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·45 minutes agoI didn’t read it because the tldr is retarded.
minus-squaretaladar@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 hours agoOr someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·44 minutes agovaluing my time isn’t lazy. if you can’t summarize your post you’re probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.
wow, this some next level obnoxious boomer shit.
If you are offended by this, then you obviously didn’t read the article.
Is it incorrect?
In the sense that I don’t believe the people described exist in any significant quantity, yes.
there is no statement there so I don’t know what you mean by “incorrect”. all i see is someone who doesn’t know how people use tldr.
Was it too long for you and you didn’t read it?
In that case …This blog post is not for you.
That’s what the question mark does. It marks a question.
RTFA? RTFA!
I didn’t read it because the tldr is retarded.
Or someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.
valuing my time isn’t lazy. if you can’t summarize your post you’re probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.