• superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Counterpoint: Liking a woman’s body the way it naturally is shouldn’t be considered a fetish.

      • mayhair
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hmm, so you don’t count “foot fetishes” for instance?

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d call it a fetish if you are more attracted to feet than primary or secondary sexual organs.

          • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why you hatin’ on tertiary and quaternary characteristics?

            Body hair growth is triggered by hormonal changes, so body hair could be considered a sexual maturity adjacent characteristic.

            Do you also consider a woman’s preference for non-hairy guys to be an abnormal fetish?

            What about butts? They’re not (biologically) sexual organs, any more than mouths are; do you consider the admiration of butts to be a fetish?

            Why do you include breasts (I assume these are your secondary organs?) as in the “not a fetish” list? They have nothing to do with the passing of gametes; they’re only valuable long after the sex act.

            Your taxonomy seems rather arbitrary.