• TOModera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Very good point, I didn’t mean to conflate it happened in the last 100 years, more so the data of their deaths that I had access to had that timeliness.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even arrows or spears wouldn’t have been long enough to develop such a trait. And with those tools, still I don’t think Tiger would have been a primary target for humans. Seems like for most societies felines and canines were just not things we eat. Though maybe hunted for the pelt? In which case maybe they do eat the meat?

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also statistically (since we’re talking evolution) it wouldn’t help much against humans, we’ve got good vision and intellect, the chances to fool us enough times for this adaptation to arise are slim.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Considering evolutionary time scales, this trait may have been a response to something large and dangerous that’s extinct now.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Eating a tiger liver would probably kill you with Vitamin A poisoning, a particularly painful affliction.

        Easy to just avoid eating entirely, even if the rest of it is safe enough.