• pinkystew@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Does Trump not know what a tariff is? Or does he know, and he is deliberately misleading his followers?

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      He likely understands what a tariff is well enough. His problem is that he either doesn’t understand the implications or chooses not to communicate that part to voters.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        He understands tariffs in his terms - that “tariffs” is a useful word to trick people into doing what he wants. How tariffs work in the real world is irrelevant to him, the word gets him what he wants, and that’s all he needs from tariffs.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          except he “renegotiated” nafta and is now threatening mexico with tariffs. He’s a childlike negotiator playing geopolitics backed by like 5 giant media conglomorates and silicon valley guys who reinvent busses and trains every 5 years.

          The reality is the crypto people are going to stash their crypto as the economy tanks intent on living like millionaires. Then the big money will cash out and crash that market leaving all the small holders in the dust.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Trump understands tariffs, as far as they sound fancy and like a threat to foreigners, his followers understands it even less. Using fancy words make you sound authoritative. Trump’s followers like authoritarian leaders.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In general, I say why assume malevolence when ignorance explains it as well… Trump is an exception to that rule.