OTTAWA – A smug man from Canada wasted no time this morning chastising Americans for re-electing terrifying liar and felon Donald Trump, despite the fact that he plans to vote for terrifying liar and asshole Pierre Poilievre in the next Canadian election.

Matt Hunter, a 36-year-old barista, took time away from attending a Poilievre rally to rant about how stupid Americans were for falling for Trump’s fascist bullshit.

“I just can’t believe that someone could look at a petty asshole running on slogans, lies, and faux outrage and think, ‘Yeah, this guy will be good for the country,’” Hunter laughed, taking a quick second to repost an “Axe the Tax, Build the Homes, Fix the Budget, Stop the Crime” tweet on X. “It makes no sense. Luckily we up here in Canada have more common sense. Pierre says so.”

“When Poilievre becomes Prime Minister next year, he’s gonna stand up to Trump. They’re so different in ways that I can’t even describe. Don’t even ask me what those ways are. Just trust me, bro. He’ll bring Canada home again.”

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The only thing I can hope is that after seeing Trump’s disaster south of the border people steer away from Poilievre.

    However at this point I’m terrified they’ll actually embrace it and prove we’re no better than they are.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    what even are the options this time? I’ve spoken to a few people saying they woulf be voting for polievre but they didn’t even know who else was running. I’m not feeling very hopeful about any of this considering being loud and worse than stepping in shit barefoot clearly works

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think it’s because the Conservatives are the only ones campaigning right now. I’d imagine once an election is called Trudeau and Singh (or whoever replaces them) will start campaigning a lot more.

      But yeah I’m not overly hopeful either…

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I haven’t met anyone yet who was pro Trump and didn’t have a “fuck Trudeau” bumper sticker or flag or whatever.

    But I do live in Alberta where there are just straight up genuinely people, in droves, that are pro trump antivax idiots.

    The other day several people all in a group tried to convince me that electronic voting was unreliable and only hand counting votes could be relied on…

    I love my province, but I feel an incredible sadness for most of the people that live here.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There’s no shortage of those kinds here in Ontario. I’m sure it’s not nearly as many, but I’m only trying to point out that, it’s not a uniquely Alberta phenomenon.

      It genuinely confuses me that people can have their whole identity be defined by “Trump good, Trudeau bad”

      Are people really this uninteresting? I mean, I have opinions on politics, even US politics. I don’t feel strongly enough about any of them to put a bumper sticker about it on my car, nevermind buy or fly a flag about any of it. I don’t even put political signs on my lawn (nor do I allow anyone else to). I just have so much going on that I can’t be arsed to advertise that I even have an opinion on what’s going on in politics.

      I try to always vote, and show up for every election, unless there’s a very good reason why I can’t (like being very ill, injured, hospitalized, etc). But I am not my political views, and I can’t understand people that build their identity around a politician. Surely something else you do is important? No? Okay then.

      • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As an engineer, you should know that no system is perfect and there are several trade-offs and threat models to consider. And electronic voting can’t be discussed in a vacuum, but measured against existing voting systems which are also full of their own kinds of issues and risks.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Spot on.

    This is Canada’s largest weakness: we put the bar at American stupidity, and anything marginally better gives us insufferable smugness.

  • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I came across an absolutely horrendous term the other day, “Maple MAGA”. Used un-ironically by someone I kind of know. I am quite concerned about our next election as most Canadians do NOT remember this tool was in charge of the housing portfolio under Harris. They also have not interacted with him as a low paid employee. I guess no real work experience doesn’t really matter either, only ever a politician. At least Trudy, with his trust fund, was a teacher.

  • JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Pierre Pollievres inevitable upcoming victory is just depressing as shit. I hope Quebec votes bloc just for the middle finger factor, but the sad truth is they will probably break conservative too.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I normally vote NDP even though where I live is usually a Liberal stronghold, but this time I’m tempted to vote Bloc.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 hours ago

        As much as the public sentiment is against Trudeau, voting for whoever can best prevent a Conservative majority is my pragmatic protest vote.

        • saigot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          ABC is always my vote (that means green for me). This could actually be quite the opportunity for NDP/green to pick up seats. If Mr.PP really steps in it andloses support and NDP gets off their ass and gains support it wouldn’t be totally impossible to have some freaky 5-way power struggle. Probably wishful thinking, but I think with a lot of coordination and luck it could happen

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If you’re in a region where it might go either way, vote strategically to get anyone but conservatives in, if that’s the Bloc then so be it. I personally have always voted for them since I live somewhere where it’s either them or the Liberals and I believe in what the Bloc stands for, but remember, in the end they’re there to defend Quebec’s interests first and foremost and provincial policies impact you much more than federal ones and even if there’s a referendum at some point you can just vote against it if you’re not a separatist.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        If there was a Bloc rep in my Ontario riding I would be carefully considering them vs my own NDP rep.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s surprising that no other province or group of provinces ever created their own version of the Bloc…

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The only provinces where this would have any impact at all are Quebec and Ontario. Ontario has just over a third of the seats, Quebec has about a quarter. British Columbia and Alberta have just over 10%, everyone else has less. If everyone in New Brunswick voted for the hypothetical New Brunswick First Party, whoever actually ran the show quite likely wouldn’t even think of the whopping 10 votes they could bring to the table. Moreover, Quebec is the most homogeneous province in Canada, so a province first party has better odds there than anywhere else.

            I’d much rather we had national parties that were looking for the best interests of all the regions, and citizens that didn’t seem to firmly believe that a benefit for someone else implies harm to them.

          • JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I doubt we could do much worse if we just elected 11 different provincial/territorial lobby groups that have to caucus together to pass laws.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s my opinion as well, or even grouped lobbies (BC, prairies, Ontario, Quebec, Maritimes + NFLD, territories)

      • JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s fucking ridiculous that the only party with significant seats that doesn’t want to expand the tarsands also want to break up the country. Maybe Canada is too stupid to exist.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Canada is very much a collection of separate interests that banded together for pragmatic reasons. All this nationalist nonsense people espouse is entirely manufactured. The idea that there even SHOULD be a national identity is bullshit. There should absolutely be a way for groups to leave again when it is no longer in their pragmatic interest to stay.

          • JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I mean, Quebec doesn’t evenn really want to leave. Legault has found a winning strategy that will keep his party in power for decades: Never hold a referendum, but leverage that notwithstanding clause and general nationalist animus to take and horde as much power in this province as possible forever. That way everything that goes wrong is because of the feds, and everything that goes right is because of the glorious CAQ.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Have you seen Legault’s numbers? 😂 His party is getting wiped out of Quebec come next election and the PQ will be reborn unless the Liberals elect the Messiah as their leader!

              • JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Glorious, I love to see it. At least the PQ pretend to be progressives when they aren’t selling out the north to foreign mining companies, restricting minority rights and generally sucking shit.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I worry that Pollievre will happily invigorate the Quebec separatist movement.

      I’m at a stage in my life where I value stability. I feel like my family can weather many storms, but Canada crumbling isn’t one of them.

    • Slayan@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Last poll i saw (when he tried to reverse gov) was 50%+ bloc followed by 25% ish cfor the con

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Lil’PP is about to lose Quebec big time based on polls numbers but he will have a majority without Quebec like Harper managed to get once.