• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The tariffs will be paid by the importing companies, and then it will cause the prices of those goods to rise.

    The hope is that this will incentivize and result in more development of the American manufacturing sector, resulting in medium and long term gains.

    Short term there will definitely be a cost, paid by us.

    • Delta_V@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The hope is that this will incentivize and result in more development of the American manufacturing sector

      Tariffs alone are not enough. Expanding production is a long term investment, but there’s no guarantee a tariff will still exist in 4 years. Its risky to invest capital to meet tariff-induced demand when that demand might disappear before your new factory is even finished being built.

      Uncle Sam can mitigate that risk by subsidizing the construction of new factories while the tariffs are in place.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        According to this video, Biden maintained at least some of the targeted tariffs Trump put in place before. So there might be some bipartisan support for tariffs across multiple Presidencies.

        Unfamiliar with this channel so I can’t vouch for accuracy.

        https://youtu.be/lD3FX_wxqUI

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We can do that without import taxes. I deride Biden’s CHIPs act as a giveaway to billionaires but it is certainly going to cause chip manufacturers to move their operations to the US instead of China. While I’m not excited about more low wage jobs, I’m less excited about import taxes that codify domestic monopolies and often cost jobs.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        How do you figure it would cost jobs? Just less economic activity over all? Importing business just can’t do business any more and goes under? That will definitely happen in some places, if those companies are just barely hanging on.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Monopolies don’t need as much manpower as companies in competition. There’s less marketing, less customer service, less quality control, and ultimately less production staff. They don’t care if the item gets back ordered, if you wait on hold for hours, or you think there’s a better product overseas. They don’t have to care.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Long term the cost will also be paid by us. Prices won’t go down when we start producing locally.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Compared to importing for 30% extra? The only reason that would happen is some mass market collusion. The prices will go higher, then manufacturing picks up locally, driving prices down, lower than it was previously - since you don’t need to ferry them across an ocean. Foreign goods would be 30% more expensive.

        At least that’s the theory / how it is supposed to work. In reality, probably a shitton of issues, a new great depression and not much more manufacturing potential as a result. There will be tarrifs on the US too, needlessly closing off trade both ways.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          True. There will likely be retaliatory tariffs hurting our exports too. But our exports are smaller than our imports currently, so currently it doesn’t hurt us as much.

        • Eranziel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Your first paragraph assumes that labour costs are the same in both markets and that there is little development or tooling cost to setting up that manufacturing base locally. Both are false, and both of those are really the reason overseas manufacturing is a thing in the first place.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Depends on what you are manufacturing. Making shit with mills, CNC, lathes, injection molding? That’s not a problem. CMM, EDM and very precise CNC? Yeah, that needs a machine with a high upfront cost. It all depends on if you are able to get customers and if you have the raw resources / the raw resources don’t price you out of existence. Overseas manufacture is worth it because it used to be cheap labor costs. You had to fix a lot of things, but it was still cheaper than making it 100% in house. Then China started becomming less competetive and it still was cheaper, but barely. Add onto it a 30% tarrif and the entire equation changes.

            Again, it probably will be painful. But we will have to see.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The expected benefits don’t include prices going down. They include:

        • overall purchasing power going up
        • more military independence
        • more political independence
        • staying ahead in the AI race
        • more Americans get to spend their days building things