• kirk781OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They are a major force in the Chinese market so maybe it might see some traction there, but otherwise, I still don’t see a third mobile OS getting genuine market share.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I dunno, kinda doubt it.
    I don’t think most devs will be really thrilled on having to support another platform with a seemingly petty different SDK.
    I think that not offering any type of Android compatibility, no matter how limited, will prove to be a mistake

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        for normal users they get a improvement in security!

        Microkernels by having a reduced risk surface provider better security, less vulnerabilities, and more compartmentalization. Programs simply have less privileges

        Harmony OS is closed source, and run by a company in a country that has done some… flexible things with data security… but at least with a microkernel its less likely third parties will violate your security, only second parties here!

        • user_naa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Most malware doesn’t target the kernel directly, so I don’t think it will change anything, especially if Linux used with seccomp like in Android. For people who really cares about privacy proprietary OS with preinstalled spyware already is a nightmare.