• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    28 minutes ago

    I know it would be covenient to accept this meme as true, but it very much isn’t.

    Just like insurance companies in the US don’t cover everything you need, sometimes even lifesaving treatment, the same (though less extreme) happens in nearly all public health systems.

    I say this as someone who has gone through this and become tubefed and deaf as a result.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      55 minutes ago

      Having lived in two countries with universal healthcare, that meme is absolutelly true and you’re the one bullshitting.

      The most “extreme” it can get in such systems is that they won’t pay for very expensive treatments (i.e. the kind of stuff that costs a million dollars per shot) if a person can keep going with cheaper ones even if they’re not as good.

      Even then, sometimes they will if it’s actually worth it (as in: for something that’s a cure, not for something that just keeps the patiet going and is only 10% better than the next best option whilst costing 1000x more).

      That’s “your quality of life won’t be as good if you have a chronic disease that makes your life miserable and the best treatment in the market is insanelly expensive because they’ll only pay for a not as expensive one”, not “death panels”.

      People in those countries absolutelly aren’t going bankrupt due to being denied life-saving treatment and having to pay for it from their own pocket.

      As for any complains you might have heard from people in countries with universal healthcare, them complaining about it is like people in Scandinavia complaining about public services: relative to what they have there are bad parts, which is something altogether different than it being bad relative to the World and when it comes the healthcare the US is 3rd World when it comes to results delivered relative to the amount spent in it.

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        48 minutes ago

        Sorry then.

        I guess me living my entire life in a system with universal healthcare, being denied treatments that could have prevented me going deaf and needing a feeding tube is all in my imagination.

        The treatments for these werent extreme. It was a fairly simple drug therapy that costs around 5’000 Euro per year and is sold in my country.

        It just isn’t on the list of drugs covered by public health insurance. As I’m surviving on 12k per year disability benefits, I could not afford the treatment.

        But just because it never impacted you you assume my experience doesn’t exist, because you have the privilege that the system never didn’t work for you, so you assume it works for everyone.

    • Nalivai
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t think there is a public health system when you are just expected to fork over half a million for an operation. Those insane healthcare prices are uniquely US phenomenon

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        44 minutes ago

        There are public health systems that just won’t offer that operation. Or you’ll have a 1.5 year waiting list. So in the end, unless you’re rich and pay for private insurance, it comes out as the same.

        (Edit: since someone thought my take is because I’m american and don’t understand. I’m european, have lived most my life in europe, this is from lived experience)

        • Nalivai
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, that happens sometimes. But in this case the price of an operation will be drastically cheaper.
          I had this situation in Germany, there was a minor operation I needed to have which was not life threatening so the one that insurance covered had a waiting period, so I decided to go pay out of pocket and it was around 800 euro. The cheapest price I could find in US for it started at 11000 dollars.

            • Nalivai
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              45 minutes ago

              If you’re disabled and on disability income, it will absolutely not cost you 800 euro. You will be put in front of the queue for the free one. That’s why I, able bodied working person with slightly above median income, had to wait. And I think it’s as fair of a system that is possible under the circumstances.

              • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                42 minutes ago

                That’s not how it works in my country. Great that that’s how your country works. The vast majority of those with universal healthcare don’t work like that.

                I used to work for a disability advocacy organisation so I can assure you that.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              42 minutes ago

              For every case of a disabled persion on benefits having to wait 1.5 years for a non-urgent operation because they can’t afford private healthcare, there are a million of cases of people who get a common problem like Diabetes or Cardio-Vascular problems and get treated for free (down to getting the medicine for free, which for a person below the poverty line will be true even for the worst countries) rather than suddenly being faced with an extra monthly bill for medicine (which would be a massive hit for those poor people you cosplay as caring about for the sake of argument) or a massive bill for urgent surgery.

              (Which reminds me: one thing that will NEVER happen in one of those countries, unlike in the US, is when one ends up in the emergency ward and requires an expensive treatment to save their life, they won’t get a massive bill at the end)

              Oh, and even if you pay out of pocket for medicine, it’s way cheaper in those countries than the US, as governments have used their leverage to limit what Pharmaceutial companies can charge, unlike in the US.

              The healthcare risks for the average individual in countries with Universal Healthcare aren’t even in the same universe as in the US.

              • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                45 minutes ago

                You’re vastly underestimating the number of disabled and poor people and you’re vastly overestimating the number of things that are covered.

                I get your proud of your country or your system or whatever, but please don’t minimise the experience of already marginalised groups.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 minutes ago

                  Mate, as I’ve said it’s not one but TWO countries I lived in with Universal Healthcare, and you can’t be a Nationalist (as you’re trying to imply) for TWO countries.

                  If you’re comparing like to like - i.e. the average poor disabled person in both a country with Universal Healthcare and the US - you’re going to get some cases of those having insufficient treatment in countries with UHC (especially in those were neoliberal governments have been defunding their UHC systems to try and privatise Healthcare even against popular will, like the UK), whilst the vast majority of those people will be fucked in the US (unless they’re Veterans).

                  I’ve lived in several countries and it’s just an enormous peace of mind living in a country were you know that if you’re involved in an accident and end up getting costly treatement in an emergency ward, you’re not going to be ruined.

                  I think you’re seeing the problems relative to a specific baseline and you think that there are massive problems there (which I’m sure there are) but the thing with the US system is that the baseline itself is way worse and all those problem you see would also be problems there but much worse (or maybe not, as those people would die a lot faster, at which point no problem would be visible) and on top of that in the US there are way more people with even worse problems when it comes to Healthcare than the “poor disabled person” in a country with UHC.

                  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    18 minutes ago

                    Dude I’ve lived in France, Switzerland, Austria, and the UK.

                    I’m not trying to tell you universal healthcare is bad. I’ve never said the US system is better, in fact it’s far worse. Don’t straw man me.

                    All I said is the statistics on the meme are false and ignore a lot of suffering and death. And you took that as a personal attack on universal healthcare.