• AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Our generation has warning labels because their generation actually did it. Buncha lead addled boomers acting like we’re fools for learning from their stupidity.

  • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    Taking away the instructions on how to service and repair a car was a result of capitalists wanting to make more money by forcing you to get your car repaired by them.

    Adding instructions not to drink battery acid is likely for companies to avoid getting sued because people will always argue that there was no warning about drinking battery acid so the company owes you compensation.

    This is a false comparison.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Also helps them get away with hiding shoddy/cheap parts.

      ~2018-2020 Hondas have defective air condensers. They aren’t rated for the refrigerant. They are basically guaranteed to fail. You also have to go to a dealership to get your AC serviced. There’s a warranty for the AC, but it’s that dealer that checks whether your AC meets the warranty or not (amazing how easy it is to find bits of debris and deny the warranty when no third party can double check.)

      You could crack open an original Xbox and do a lot of modifications with it. The Xbox 360 was designed to be as annoying to take apart as possible, possibly to hide the cheap components that lead to the red ring of death…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Xbox 360 was designed to be as annoying to take apart as possible, possibly to hide the cheap components that lead to the red ring of death…

        actually, this was probably to fit it into the very weird and particular form factor that microsoft wanted it to fit in.

        The red ring of death issue was actually due to faulty chip manufacturing, rather than bad cooling, it was an inevitable flaw due to manufacturing defects, rather than design failures. The heating and cooling cycles just greatly exaggerated the effect of the problem, that’s why it’s so closely linked.

        Also you could’ve mentioned the update fuses in the CPU, IIRC there are fuses that are blown when the system updates, to prevent you from going back, no matter what you do.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean I do agree with you. Planned obsolescence and whatnot is very real.

      But also, fixing a car from 70’s is very different than trying to fix a car from this millenium.

      As technology improves and becomes more detailed, it might also get harder to repair. This isn’t to be taken as a defense of companies which have used planned obsolescence. But even if there was a very user friendly car company, I think it would be more complex to adjust your valves today than it was 30-40 years ago.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean I do agree with you. Planned obsolescence and whatnot is very real.

        it’s complicated, a good example, actually probably the ideal example, of planned obsolescence is airpods. Designed to not be repaired, thrown away, and then replaced.

        It can also apply to things like “lifetime” designed products, you may design something to mechanically wear out, before it needs to be maintained, or perhaps, require no maintenance, until you need to replace it. It’s harder to say whether this is strictly planned obsolescence, or just cost cutting engineering, which in the long run, probably doesn’t change much.

        i think the most semantically accurate version of this would be releasing a product that is 100% good, and then a year later releasing a product that is 200% good, surpassing and replacing the previous product entirely, removing the previous product from the product line up, and only supporting the most recent product. I.E. it’s planned to become obsolete, shortly into the future.

        Vehicles are also a weird market segment, they’ve gotten considerably more reliable since the early days of the automotive industry, they’ve gotten significantly more comfortable, they’ve gotten significantly more safe. They’ve also gotten several orders of magnitude more complicated since than as well. To deal with the aforementioned advances. Though there have been a lot of issues in recent manufacturing leading to parts that are just, bad.

  • Whateley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Back in my day we drank from the hose if we got thirsty and lined up in the street to get sprayed with DDT and painted our homes with lead. Those were the days!

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    if everyone had common sense back then we wouldn’t be in the middle of this shitshow today

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you want to play relative knowledge, 50 years ago they used asbestos as bathroom waterproofing

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    ::sigh:: Old cars had instructions on adjusting valves because you needed to. Improvements in manufacturing processes means that valves and valve seats simply don’t wear the way that they use to. You may still need to change valve shims if your clearance is out of tolerance, but on most cars that’s going to be well over 100,000 miles before service is needed. It’s also a really tedious, long job, and takes tools that most people aren’t going to have. (I have done it multiple times on a motorcycle; that’s a 10,000 miles service interval b/c the engines on the bikes I ride redlines at 18,000rpm, which means significantly more wear on engines, and higher chances of thing like valve flutter.) Cars are vastly more complicated than they used to be, because they’re also far, far more efficient, and last far longer; it used to be a big deal if a car made it to 100,000 miles, and now a car that dies at 100k is considered an unreliable lemon.

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well, they don’t last far longer as a whole, but the advances in machining tolerances and material science, the mechanical internals can go far longer without anything more than fluid changes.

      As far as longevity, soy based wiring harnesses, poorly shielded ECUs, and borked software updates are what are killing cars these days.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a whole, they def. do last longer. I can look on FB Marketplace right now and find cars that are in fairly good, operational condition with 250,000 miles. The issues you’re talking about aren’t the kind of major mechanical things that become improbably expensive to repair, e.g., a broken timing chain with high interference valves & cylinders. Although yeah, replacing a main wiring harness on a car is a PITA and very expensive unless you can find a functional used one on eBay.

        Also, there’s not great empirical evidence that the soy-based insulation is significantly worse than its petroleum based counterpart. There’s a ton of anecdotal claims about it attracting rodents, but no direct evidence AFAIK. The class-action lawsuits over rodent damage have been dismissed. And, TBF, I’ve had older cars that had wiring chewed by mice. Part of the difference with newer cars seems to be that there’s just more wiring packed into smaller areas, areas that look like great nests for rodents; you didn’t see that kind of wiring density 20 years ago.

    • hotspur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Right, or that back then they just didn’t care if you drank the battery because there wasn’t a hugely well-developed culture of lawsuits like we have now. Those fuckers in 1914-1950 were definitely down for a battery party, no doubt. The ones that made it now think that everyone had common sense because only the ones that did made it through.

  • unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    And who are the people that are the reason for this having to be in the manual. Its the people that were born 50+ years ago…

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    50ish years ago, back when people actually read Popular Science, they told people to dispose of their old motor oil by digging a small hole in your backyard, filling it with gravel, and pouring the motor oil into it.

    Oh and don’t forget all the advertisements for your Doctor’s favorite cigarette.

    Also, there are two main actual reasons why far fewer car manuals nowadays include instructions on valve adjustments:

    1. A whole lot more modern cars use hydro-compensators, which greatly reduces the need to manually adjust the valves.

    2. Car companies really, really want you to go to a dealership or officially certified maintenance shop so they can overcharge you on maintenance.

    • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      But pray do tell me, what generation is responsible for car manufacturers discouraging repair and forcing you to go to certified dealers?

  • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    And who put lead in the gas? Cars aren’t that simple anymore anyways.

    Which generation can’t let go of power?

    Nah. I call bullshit.