Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    Like many here on awful.systems I have a pretty thick skin, but reading the above put me in a really weird mood all day.

    same here. the thing is, I think a lot of us are on awful.systems because weā€™ve seen far too much of how fascism operates and spreads online. this is an antifascist place; itā€™s so core to the mission that we donā€™t publish it as a policy (because a policy can be argued against and twisted and the fash kids love doing that), we just demonstrate it in a way that canā€™t be ignored. so seeing the first or second (I donā€™t keep track of these things) most popular social media platform publish a policy whose only purpose is to be used as a weapon against marginalized people, for it to be written in a matter-of-fact ā€œthis is just how it isā€ way, and for essentially nobody outside of the fediverse to push back on it in any real way ā€” that is shocking.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        Ā·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Now the new language merely bans ā€œunsupported comparisonsā€ between protected groupsā€™ on the basis of their ā€œinherent intellectual capacityā€

        Im sure we all noticed that this is also exactly one of those things which was allowed in the Rationalist places. And one of the reasons that it took them forever to get rid of slurinnameO on the ssc subreddit (E: He now moved to twitter where he has a terrifying 200k followers (cremieuxrecueil if you want to block the shithead)).