• upstream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to think DisplayPort was the future, about 10-13 years ago.

    By now I feel it has come and gone.

    HDMI 2.1+ is making its way in everywhere.

    • It’s a better plug.
    • It tends to support enough pixels/Hz for most people.
    • It’s more ubiquitous, being on both TV’s laptops, and monitors.

    Pretty sure the PC desktop segment will keep the port alive for a while, but right now it doesn’t seem like a very useful port apart from having a plug that claws itself in place and is often unnecessarily hard to unplug.

    With Ultra High Speed HDMI (these names are ridiculous, seriously, look at the standard names) there’s very few, if any, reasons to use DP, apart from compliant HDMI cables costing an arm and a leg.

    To be honest I’m struggling a bit to understand why it’s not just all pushed through a CAT6/7 Ethernet cable at this point.

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      DisplayPort is a better system than HDMI. It even can ride piggy back on USB-C, which means a display can both power a computer on the same line as it connects to a laptop with. DisplayPort also supports daisy chaining(although it’s not a common feature on monitors), so you could potentially have a single USB-C cable going to a laptop and then have multiple monitors connected with needing a dock or anything of that sort.

      • upstream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But (most of that) that’s the display port standard, not the plug.

        DisplayPort over USB-C works mostly fine, except that it’s “fine”, not perfect. Daisy chaining tends to make it less fine.

        It’s a better standard, but a worse plug. Important distinction.

        That doesn’t matter in the long run though. Better doesn’t always win.

        Just look at how USB won over FireWire. And FireWire could daisy chain too

        My iPhone 13 Pro syncs slower over USB than my second generation iPod did over FireWire.

        While I obviously can’t blame that fully on USB, it’s an ironic observation, especially since my OG iPod would be 21 years old now, if it still worked.

        • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your iPhone 13 syncs slower over USB because Apple decided to stay on Lightning connectors, which use USB 2.0 on the other end. Although FireWire was faster back when it co-existed with USB, the USB standard has surpassed it a long time ago with more power, faster speeds, and better physical connectors.

          • beefcat@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Shift the argument back to 2012 before Lightning and it still holds. Their point is that USB 2.0 is slower than FireWire was. FireWire had been dead for years by the time USB 3.0 came around, and USB 3.0 required bulky connectors that never really caught on with mobile devices. It wasn’t until USB 3.1 with the C-type connector came along in 2015 that mobile devices finally started seeing wired transfer speeds that could meet or exceed FireWire.

          • upstream@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I know, and commented on it (just not explicitly).

            The irony is still there though.

            And for many years it was an actual limitation of the USB interface as well. Only with USB 3, which didn’t see widespread adoption until 2009-2010 did USB surpass FireWire 400 speeds. And let’s not forget there was FireWire 800 as well.

          • upstream@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Go to your local electronics store and see if that is true when you want a cable “today”.

            There’s a difference between theory and practice.

            Different countries and regions may have better markets for DP cables, but I can’t recall having had options other than length.

          • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would you even want that, the locking mechanism is imo one of the advantages DP has over HDMI, I had one too many instances of the HDMI plug getting lose in the socket causing signal loss (granted, not a big issue for Home Theater but def. an issue for some people for PC usage).

            • upstream@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              YMMV, obviously.

              Locking DP is a pain in the ass for me. HDMI disconnecting was never an issue either.

              I just wish I had a choice, but in practice I don’t as selection of cables is poor.

              I never screwed in VGA or DVI connectors either.

              Personally I prefer the plug falling out instead of the connector and/or cable getting damaged if you pull on it.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the FireWire memories. I got the first Windows compatible iPod and bought a FireWire card just to use it.

      • Odiousmachine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        My monitors support daisy chaining and I just need to connect my laptop via USB-C. It’s really so much better and makes cable management easier.

    • cmnybo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because of some HDMI licensing bullshit, HDMI is limited to 4k60 when using open source graphics drivers.

      • averyminya@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like that latching plug, dislike how manufacturers put it on only one side.

        That’s the only real solution IMO, because monitor makers are gonna do what they do. Terrible frames, oddly angled, recessed. Once it’s in? Latching is awesome. Ever need to remove it? Fuck it, buy a new monitor.

      • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The nicest part is you don’t HAVE to use a latching plug. Friction fit plugs are compliant with the standard, and they are available for sale. My Dell 1440p 165hz displays came with a very nice friction fit DisplayPort cable.

        https://a.co/d/eCiOkiN

        Latching connectors are better for permanent setups or commercial displays however, as they won’t wiggle themselves loose.

    • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      a plug that claws itself in place

      Just FYI, you can get DP cables without the retention clips. I too find them unnecessary and annoying.

      • upstream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can, but they’re hard to come by where I live at least. I have two, but they’re Mini DP to DP. So haven’t gotten to use them since I was running my 970 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        We also have 10-30 cables of each of the usual lengths in the IT supply room at the office, and they all have the same mechanism, no matter what manufacturer was chosen during purchasing.

        And then, once in a while, you come across a screen where the port is rotated 180 degrees so the push is between the plug and the back of the screen and you basically need child labor to unplug it in proper manner.

        • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          where the port is rotated 180 degrees so the push is between the plug and the back of the screen

          That ought to be a crime! I would be getting fed up with that pretty quickly and making some improvised modifications to disable the retention clips!

          • ditty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            In this situation I typically pull out my Leatherman’s knife to depress the clips, but it’s definitely not easy

        • egonallanon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Really? It’s been years since I’ve seen a display port connector with the latches on them.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because it’s more ubiquitous doesn’t make it a better plug.

      DP 2.1 is technically superior to HDMI in many ways, especially since it’s the protocol that runs through USB C and supports daisy chaining, unlike HDMI which has to be converted to and from DP to be passed through USB C.

      I don’t see your argument with “it’s a better plug” either, the DisplayPort connector is available as a locking or non-locking connector, is keyed better than HDMI and in my experience is more solid.

      The only reason HDMI is as common as it is is because there’s a consortium putting money into it to keep it popular because they can charge license fees from manufacturers. DP is free to use and developed by VESA, the standard can be downloaded directly from their website and added to whatever device you’re developing with no need to license. HDMI charges licensing fees PER PORT, which is why you often see GPUs with one HDMI and three DPs.

      TL;DR: HDMI is only more common because a group has in its best financial interests to keep it popular, despite it playing catch-up with DP.

      • upstream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never said DP wasn’t a better standard. Or that HDMI was better because of being ubiquitous.

        It’s certainly not keyed better than HDMI, that’s just ridiculous. If you ever had a laptop with Display Port, or see people interact with one, you would notice that it’s too similar to USB, e-sata (which has become mostly irrelevant, if not even fully), and HDMI.

        On top of that it’s difficult to feel if it’s the wrong way round. Easy to see, difficult to feel.

        DisplayPort is in practice not available as a non-locking connector, but keying and the locking connector makes it worse.

        While, sure, someone makes money off of HDMI, it’s not an argument for popularity.

        I never agreed with the facts of your comment, but I think you are using poor arguments to make an invalid point.

        I’m not arguing for HDMI either, btw. I’m just attempting to predict the future.