Guys, at this rate I don’t think the revolution’s going to happen anytime soon.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 个月前

      I’m not sure what you’re saying.

      If landlords can assume every tenant they’ll ever see has 2,000 plus their income, then they can just set rent to be 2,000 plus the average income of the area (or whatever it is they do currently). That’s what I’m worried about.

      Like, I’m worried about inter-landlord collusion that happens not because they’re talking to each other but because they can all assume the same facts about you.

      I mean, truthfully, I think landlords should be cut out of the game anyway, but that’s a wholly separate issue.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 个月前

          and make a lot of money doing so.

          I don’t want people to make a lot of money off of housing. Why would I want that?

          Look, people had more relative income before, and rent is too high now. If UBI gives people more income now, rent will be too high later. There need to be rent caps. UBI alone doesn’t fix the fundamental problem.

          I mean, at best you’re saying that laissez-faire competition will make rent caps unnecessary, to which I say great! Let’s add them anyway. No one will ever set rent as high as the cap, so there should be no problem.