• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Terrible for him. Great for everyone else that that 40 billion is now in the hands of other people. 

    It’s also ironic, that he is single-handedly the greatest redistributor of his own wealth. 

      • Fraylor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean he did spend 44 billion prior to said nuking. Site isn’t worth as much now sure, but the volume of currency still traveled into the hands of others.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twitter having overwhelming dominance may have had value to shareholders, but IMO that is at the expense of everyone else. Not having to use Twitter is valuable.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      40 billion going into the bank accounts of investors that previously owned Twitter stock certainly is a redistribution of wealth, but I doubt it’s the kind you’re referring to.