Summary

Democrats are ramping up opposition to Trump and Muskā€™s brazen assault on the federal government, which critics see as a constitutional crisis.

Protests erupted after Muskā€™s DOGE accessed taxpayer data, prompting Democratic lawmakers to pledge stronger resistance.

Senate Democrats staged an all-night protest against budget chief Russell Vought, while some senators vowed to block Trumpā€™s nominees. Hakeem Jeffries introduced legislation to curb DOGE, as activists push for McConnell-style obstruction.

Nationwide protests and lawsuits signal a revived anti-Trump resistance.

Growing grassroots engagement and local officials taking steps to counter Trumpā€™s agenda reflect intensifying opposition.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    4 days ago

    I think those are all reasonable criticisms.

    But it still seems like the constant refrain here when Trump and his Republican party are doing terrible things to set this country back is to blame the Democrats.

    The Democrats have been moving this country forward since the great reversal. There is room to criticize, but are they the biggest threat to America? I argued with someone who said Biden would go down as the worst President in history because he didnā€™t stop Trump. So heā€™s worse thanā€¦ Trump?

    ā€œEnd Racismā€ was removed as the slogan in the end zones in the stadium where the Superbowl is being hosted, and people wanted to attack neoliberals for being so soft that ā€œPeople Existā€ would be their replacement slogan. Would there have ever have been an ā€œEnd Racismā€ sign from the Saints and NFL if the ā€œneoliberalsā€ hadnā€™t been pushing things forward since LBJ?

    People constantly complain that the Democrats arenā€™t united enough to block Trumpā€™s agenda. They point to Fettermanā€™s nominee votes. Really? Itā€™s these same people who are pushing in-fighting in the party because they want to bring a very specific agenda about, and stopping fascism isnā€™t good enough.

    The American people are clearly on the fence about fascism. Your progressive agenda isnā€™t going to be winning any time soon. Real people are suffering even more today than a month ago because of Republicans. Not because of Democrats. A truck is intentionally rammed into a crowd of pedestrians, and these people are arguing the regulators didnā€™t have high enough standards for brakes on automobiles. Thatā€™s the problem that needs addressing?

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The problem is that these criticisms of the Dems do matter. Fascism doesnā€™t grow in a vacuum. Treating the Democrats as an outright enemy is idiotic, but itā€™s not at all idiotic to point out that theyā€™ve created the conditions for this swing to the hard right.

      In 2020 I predicted that a Biden victory would guarantee the Republicans win in 2024. I knew then that he would be a one term president, because heā€™s exactly the kind of hide-bound, corporate friendly Democrat that fascists love. In actuality Biden was far better than I expected; while his legislative agenda was incredibly reserved, he used the justice department and the machinery of the federal government to achieve a lot of big progressive goals. And he was in reality a hell of a lot less corporate friendly than I expected.

      But, exactly as I suspected, his goals were still far too reserved, his actions designed to pay off much too far in the future and the result was that at a time when people were struggling with a skyrocketing cost of living, Bidenā€™s government was trumpeting ā€œeconomic accomplishmentsā€ that in no way translated to the average person having more money in their pocket. People arenā€™t so stupid that they canā€™t figure out how poor they are. Progressive policies have to actually achieve progressive goals to be popular, and billionaires getting richer while everyone else gets poorer is the opposite of that.

      Biden would have been a great president in the nineties. But itā€™s too late for his quiet, dignified approach to politics. Theyā€™ve run out the clock. We hit ā€œFrance five days before the revolutionā€ levels of wealth inequality a while ago, and the average person is ready to burn everything down on the 0.001% chance that something better might emerge.

      You canā€™t resist fascism with quiet, dignified centrism. Weimar Germany tried that. Look where it got them.

      You resist fascism by solving the underlying problems that make fascism appealling. This is true one on one when dealing with individual converts (there are some great studies and practical examples on this, showing how the best way to peel people off of fascist movements is to help them resolve the problems in their personal lives) and its equally true at the mass scale. Fascism feeds on the feeling that traditional governance is failing the masses. Mussolini got elected on promises to solve the political gridlock that was preventing the government from doing anything useful. Hitler was elected because people were feeling intense economic hardship and he offered simplistic solutions. By the time Hitler and Mussolini achieved power, the second most likely outcome in either country was that the Communists took over. In Spain the hard left actively fought a war against the fascists for control of the country. These are not conditions where the status quo can be maintained, and anyone whose overriding objective is to wholly or largely to maintain the status quo is ultimately creating the conditions where fascism grows best.

      The Dems are not evil in the way that the GOP are evil, and they are inherently preferable to the GOP as a result, but as they are now they cannot - not will not, cannot - save the country from fascism. Instead they have inadvertently enabled it by being unable to take the kind of radical action necessary to prevent its growth.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      ā€œEnd Racismā€ was removed as the slogan in the end zones in the stadium where the Superbowl is being hosted, and people wanted to attack neoliberals for being so soft that ā€œPeople Existā€ would be their replacement slogan. Would there have ever have been an ā€œEnd Racismā€ sign from the Saints and NFL if the ā€œneoliberalsā€ hadnā€™t been pushing things forward since LBJ?

      If the ā€œneoliberalā€ party wasnā€™t around to constantly stop socialism, do nothing slogans like that wouldnā€™t need to exist at all. Slavery would have actually been banned, not enshrined in the constitution as punishment. FDR wouldnā€™t have even been elected, it would have been Eugene Debs or someone even more radical. The purpose of the democratic party is to make sure that things cannot get better economically unless a large corporation benefits first and foremost.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yeah except people donā€™t vote for progressives. Soā€¦

        Either these ideas are great and people will get off their ass for them or they arenā€™t. Im not convinced itā€™s the Democrats who are stopping progress. Itā€™s the lazy ass American people who wouldnā€™t know a good idea if it bit them in the ass.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          Ā·
          3 days ago

          Yeah except people donā€™t vote for progressives.

          When theyā€™re shown progressive policies, they support them. When theyā€™re told those policies are associated with Democrats or progressives, they donā€™t support them.