• Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That stretch of logic sounds an awful lot, like a post-hoc justification after learning it wasn’t about the US. But ok

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t doubt that. But its still a large stretch, to think the UK passed a law applying to all UK citizens, specifically to give the US access to a few thousand dual citizens.

          I’m thinking LoudWaterHombre was right. You simply have an extremely US centric mindset.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now you’re moving the goal post, and pointing to a slippery slope, still trying to justify your original misunderstanding. It’s alright to be wrong sometimes.

          • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey Buddy, this article is about UK and you argue for it to be about the US. Clearly the UK did not pass a law to bend over for your orange overlord.

            This whole discussion is bonkers.