• trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The difference is mainly that the UK has their own nuclear warheads, so adapting a plane that’s partially manufactured by them to those bombs is a pretty straightforward task that doesn’t require sharing of secrets with an increasingly hostile “ally”.

    • a887dcd7a@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Thanks for explaining. I was under the impression they can carry US made warheads, but this makes much more sense.

      • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        That’s just a guess from me, but since the UK has a domestic nuclear weapons programme, it would make a lot of sense to them to develop their own bombs and equip their own aircraft for dropping them.

        A different part of the UK’s nuclear deterrent is awfully US dependent, though, they chose US made Trident ballistic missiles as carrier system for their submarine launched strategic warheads.

        • a887dcd7a@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Dated March 2023 this article is not so explicit about Typhoon being capable 😬 So they bought the F-35 (but remanufactured the electroings much like Israel).