• unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Another W from getting rid of this shitty, overcomplicated, tax sucking, maintainance nightmare of a technology.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, it was such a great move to first switch to fossil fuels and then have the gas line that gives you cheap gas blow up.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think it has more to do with the 15% downturn in German industrial output over the same timespan due to the reliance on Russian gas now having to be replaced with LNG.

      • unexposedhazard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Wrong. 2.02 billion m³ of the total 2.56 billion m³ reduction came from just nuclear powerplants. The rest of the energy sector still uses 6.59 billion m³ but considering there were barely any reactors still running in 2019 this is a massive reduction from just turning off those few reactors.