• ShadowRam@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, in the colder climates that have natural gas piped to homes anyway.

    Why not use a pilot light worth of gas to keep the evap side a tad bit warmer on the days that it drops real cold.

    Sure, your still using some gas, but you’ll be extreme sipping at it.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather go full electric and get rid of the gas infrastructure entirely tbh. Take that cost and put it towards local power generation+storage.

      Heat pumps most of the time and radiant electric heat for the few times the heat pump won’t quite cut it. Geothermal if that’s an option in your location.

      • debounced@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        the upfront cost for something like geothermal is still outrageous, though. anecdotally, i bought my house with an older unit that ended up catastrophically failing after the reversing valve got stuck and destroyed the compressor. only 1 local shop in the area serviced the thing (same people who installed it when the house was built…) and the unit had long been discontinued since the company that made it (hydro delta) went bankrupt years ago. it was over $15k to put in a new updated unit… luckily my home owners insurance (with the help of a rider i added a year earlier that covered home systems) footed the bill, albeit after a long and arduous battle with the 3rd party shits that state farm outsourced it to. now this new system has a 10 year warranty on parts and labor, otherwise, i would have switched to gas in a heart beat. i can put in a new gas unit every year for 10 years at the same price… so while the geo’s monthly electric bill is nice, i wouldn’t dare install a new residential build with geo… plus add another easy $50k for the loop field if it’s a new install.

        i’m afraid what’s going to happen once then 10 years are up since that always seems to be about the time major home appliances fail… probably try to move by then so it isn’t my problem, lol.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Counterpoint: electrifying homes is also a huge cost savings in general once you are at the point where you’re willing to forgo that big gas furnace in favor of an efficient heat pump system.

      Cookers use very little gas. It’s really only water heaters and furnaces that use a lot of it, and heat pump units are incredibly efficient for both those tasks. Though I will admit that the noise a heat pump water heater makes is just atrocious and you’ll need to figure out if your can manage that in your life (e.g., by setting it to only run at night, when you’re out of the house, or putting it somewhere far away from where you spend time).

      Keeping a gas hookup at $15+/month for a single appliance like a water heater or range is an expense a lot of people can and should trim, but instead they treat it like a sunk cost and think “well I have this one appliance, so I may as well get MORE gas appliances”. Which is intended. The whole “now you’re cooking with gas” campaign and all the nonsense ad campaigns about how gas ranges cook better than electric* was a deliberate (astroturf) marketing campaign from natural gas utilities because they knew that keeping electric cookers in the house would stop people from abandoning the appliances that ACTUALLY use gas but were hard to get people passionate about. This isn’t a conspiracy theory; we have the memos and POs.

      * the difference is at best unnoticeable to the average cook and I truly believe the performance is worse, especially when factoring in time spent cleaning. Electric ovens are flatly better and modern electric cook tops work super well, even if not induction.

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not an argument I’ve seen in this conversation yet, but I’ll also head this off: gas ranges are not the best cooktop for ultimate temperature control either. If you cook sugar or temper chocolate a lot, a standalone induction cooktop like the Breville Control Freak will do a way better job, and you don’t need to change your permanent kitchen appliances to make that work. Combine that with an induction kettle like others have mentioned, and the broiler for peppers (I do this weekly having moved somewhere that doesn’t have gas) and there is literally no reason to choose gas in the kitchen.

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perhaps more importantly gas is just way more dangerous, heats up the space way too much when you don’t need it and wastes the heat, and overall just isn’t good for you - you need a well ventilated kitchen. Gas ranges need to die.

        • lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          a standalone induction cooktop like the Breville Control Freak will do a way better job,

          at $1,499.95 for a single burner it better damn well.

          • thejevans@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s for sure a professional tool, but nobody else really needs those features anyway.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gas is great if you need to boil a pot of water right now. Like in a restaurant kitchen.

        Any application that is not in a massive rush is just fine on electric.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even modern radiant electric boils water faster (pretty typical for even a pretty low-end electric top to have a 3500-5000W quick boil burner). And induction or a kettle both do it a near order of magnitude faster. Not to mention none of them hugely heat up the room or require a superpower ventilator that sucks out your conditioned air. If boiling water fast is the task you care about, gas is almost certainly the worst choice. At least for home use.

          Commercial kitchens are a different story that isn’t even part of the discussion. Even with three-phase power, to run an all-electric mid size-large commercial kitchen would likely require some crazy service level that wouldn’t be available in many places. It’ll be a while before that is an option.

          • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If boiling water fast is the task you care about, gas is almost certainly the worst choice. At least for home use.

            Well technically electric ranges are worse, but other than that you’re right.

        • Onihikage@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve found induction cooktops do just as well as gas at boiling water. The frustrating thing about them right now is the market is immature, so the good ones cost well over $1000 per burner and the cheap ones are so much worse (lousy coil sizes and poor heating precision) they aren’t worth using as anything more than a camping stove for tiny little pans where you don’t need precision. It’s like nobody in the industry wants to make these things good enough to actually replace the old technology, they just want to price gouge for all it’s worth while it’s still seen as the “expensive, hard to make, premium option”.

          • Brkdncr@artemis.camp
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have both a gas and the cheapest induction range/oven combo I could find and the induction is way better.

            People saying gas is better are just wrong.

            Gas should be incentivized out of residential new construction, and probably banned from new multi family dwellings

          • admiralteal@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Very good induction cooktops are nowhere near $1,000 per hob and can boil water in a fraction the time as gas. Don’t buy the Frigidaire crapola and the stating price for a very good full induction convection range with 4-5 hobs is ~$1,250. Spend twice that and you’ll have a machine with no downsides.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even then induction is faster and cooks more even, maybe restaurants need open flame, but yeah I don’t think anyone at home needs gas anymore. If you don’t care how you cook you can go electric. If you really care in many ways induction is better than gas.

          • admiralteal@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Really, the only thing you can’t do on an electric range that you can do on a typical gas cooker is, for example, directly fire a pepper.

            And you really don’t need to do that. You can just do it under the broiler, for example. I also don’t even insist on induction. A mid-range radiant top is STILL better than gas, in my opinion, though the induction is worth it if you can afford it.

            People will bring up woks a lot, but a gas range also can’t draw out the real advantages of a wok and you’re better off with an outdoor chimney cooker or a dedicated wok burner (induction with a small torch or gas bottle) if that’s what you really care about.

            Plus, I must again point out how fucking AWFUL it is to clean a gas cooktop compared to how trivially easy it is to clean a glass-top electric cooker. The time saved cleaning more than makes up for the advantages people list with gas even if we grant those advantages exist. Which I clearly don’t.

            • Swedneck
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              many people just have a lil’ torch for when they need flame, presumably vastly more efficient than turning on an entire burner just to scorch a chili

          • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            restaurants need open flame

            They don’t; not from gas. The obscene heat it generates in the kitchen alone is horrible for everyone working there.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t seen this argument listed yet, but my reason for wanting to go off natural gas is how much we lose in transmission. I don’t feel like finding sources right at this moment but most estimates I’ve seen are ~2%, and methane is a pretty potent greenhouse gas.

      • ShadowRam@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a fair argument. Even if every used a tiny bit, there would still be a lot of loss to the atmosphere through leaks/etc of the distribution system.

        So yes 100% elimination would be ideal.

        But this could be a viable middle step between 100% gas heating -> Supplemental/Heat Pump -> 100% Heat Pump

      • cmnybo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Methane is one of the cleanest burning fuels there is. There should be more effort put into fixing the distribution leaks rather than trying to switch everything to electric.

        • upstream@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fossil methane is still fossil. Ie. not part of the CO2 cycle, and thus contributing to the greenhouse effect. Methane itself is 20 times more potent, and we should do everything we can to limit methane emissions, both fossil and natural.

          Agriculture is a big source of natural methane emissions, and even fairly small dietary changes can significantly reduce livestock emissions, but don’t see anyone doing that either.

          Highly suspect small gas line leaks won’t be fixed either.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That is a rather big ask and maybe that effort would be better directed elsewhere.

          Also, think of it this way. Isn’t it a bit crazy we send lines of pressurized, explosive gas directly to most homes in North America? If we do need to keep burning natural gas, we can do that in power plants and get about the same, if not better efficiency by using this electrical generation with heat pumps.

    • i_am_not_a_robot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re better off heating the inside of the house with gas that heating the outside of the house with gas and using the heat pump to transfer that heat into the house. Replacing the gas line with lines for the heat pump would be best.